Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L vs. BURN 38L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L
Capacity35 L
Weight0.89 kg
Dimensions65×31×14 cm
Airline fit13%
Price$179

Feature by feature

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35LFeatureBURN 38L
Storage
removable Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 2
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt Y
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
420-denier 100% recycled nylon ripstop, 70-denier 100% nylon ripstopDX 210d Ripstop Fabric

BURN 38L

Front facing view of the BURN 38L
Capacity38 L
Weight0.45 kg
Dimensions70×25×15 cm
Airline fit13%
Price$220

Key differences between the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L and BURN 38L

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 25 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L vs. BURN 38L: which should you pack?

The BURN 38L carries 3L more than the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L (35L vs. 38L), while the BURN 38L is the lighter pack at 0.45kg (vs. 0.89kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L fits 13% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the BURN 38L; if you want to travel lighter, the BURN 38L is the better call.