Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L vs. Exped Core 35

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L
Capacity35 L
Weight0.89 kg
Dimensions65×31×14 cm
Airline fit13%
Price$179

Feature by feature

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35LFeatureExped Core 35
Storage
removable Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
420-denier 100% recycled nylon ripstop, 70-denier 100% nylon ripstop1680 D Ballistic nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water column

Exped Core 35

Front facing view of the Exped Core 35
Capacity35 L
Weight0.1 kg
Dimensions62×30×23 cm
Airline fit13%
Price$137

Key differences between the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L and Exped Core 35

Both have: backpack straps, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 23 accept both. 2 accept only the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L, and 1 accept only the Exped Core 35.

Only the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L fits

Caribbean Airlines, Croatia Air.

Only the Exped Core 35 fits

Island Air.

Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L vs. Exped Core 35: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L carries the same capacity as the Exped Core 35 (35L vs. 35L), while the Exped Core 35 is the lighter pack at 0.1kg (vs. 0.89kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L fits 13% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L; if you want to travel lighter, the Exped Core 35 is the better call.