Fyro Levo Travel Backpack vs. Bellroy Lite Travel Pack 30L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fyro Levo Travel Backpack

by Fyro
Front facing view of the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack
Capacity30 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions47×33×19 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$265

Feature by feature

Fyro Levo Travel BackpackFeatureBellroy Lite Travel Pack 30L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
side Passport top
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
16in Laptop 16in
4 Main Compartments 4
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder N
N Water Resistant N
Material
330D Kodra Nylon (PC-coated)100% recycled Dura Lite nylon

Bellroy Lite Travel Pack 30L

Front facing view of the Bellroy Lite Travel Pack 30L
Capacity30 L
Weight1 kg
Dimensions50×36×12 cm
Airline fit84%
Price$199

Key differences between the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack and Bellroy Lite Travel Pack 30L

Both have: luggage passthrough, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 158 accept both. 16 accept only the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack, and 0 accept only the Bellroy Lite Travel Pack 30L.

Only the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack fits

Aerolineas Argentinas, Air France, Air India, Air Mauritius, Boliviana de Aviacion, Cayman Airways, flybe, Indigo, InselAir, Jet Airways, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Regional Express, Sky Airlines, Virgin Australia.

Fyro Levo Travel Backpack vs. Bellroy Lite Travel Pack 30L: which should you pack?

The Fyro Levo Travel Backpack carries the same capacity as the Bellroy Lite Travel Pack 30L (30L vs. 30L), while the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack fits 92% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack; if you want to travel lighter, the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack is the better call.