Fyro Levo Travel Backpack vs. Burton Multipath 26L Commuter Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fyro Levo Travel Backpack

by Fyro
Front facing view of the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack
Capacity30 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions47×33×19 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$265

Feature by feature

Fyro Levo Travel BackpackFeatureBurton Multipath 26L Commuter Pack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
side Passport top
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
16in Laptop 16in
4 Main Compartments 4
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 1, side
N Water Resistant Y
Material
330D Kodra Nylon (PC-coated)

Burton Multipath 26L Commuter Pack

Capacity26 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions52×33×15 cm
Airline fit88%
Price$125

Key differences between the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack and Burton Multipath 26L Commuter Pack

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 167 accept both. 7 accept only the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack, and 0 accept only the Burton Multipath 26L Commuter Pack.

Only the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack fits

Belavia, Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia.

Fyro Levo Travel Backpack vs. Burton Multipath 26L Commuter Pack: which should you pack?

The Fyro Levo Travel Backpack carries 4L more than the Burton Multipath 26L Commuter Pack (30L vs. 26L), while the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack fits 92% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack; if you want to travel lighter, the Fyro Levo Travel Backpack is the better call.