Osprey Skarab 30 vs. Mammut Lithium 30

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Osprey Skarab 30

Front facing view of the Osprey Skarab 30
Capacity30 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions54×28×25 cm
Airline fit39%
Price$160

Feature by feature

Osprey Skarab 30FeatureMammut Lithium 30
Storage
4 Compression 5
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 0
top Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
N Laptop N
2 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly Y
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
bluesign® APPROVED, 100% recycled 100Dx210D high-tenacity nylon, DWR treatment made without PFAS100% Polyamide, Bluesign, PFC free, recycled

Mammut Lithium 30

Front facing view of the Mammut Lithium 30
Capacity30 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions54×26×24 cm
Airline fit40%
Price$160

Key differences between the Osprey Skarab 30 and Mammut Lithium 30

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 74 accept both. 0 accept only the Osprey Skarab 30, and 1 accept only the Mammut Lithium 30.

Only the Mammut Lithium 30 fits

Aer Lingus.

Osprey Skarab 30 vs. Mammut Lithium 30: which should you pack?

The Osprey Skarab 30 carries the same capacity as the Mammut Lithium 30 (30L vs. 30L), while the Osprey Skarab 30 is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Mammut Lithium 30 fits 40% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Osprey Skarab 30; if you want to travel lighter, the Osprey Skarab 30 is the better call.