Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L vs. Minaal Carry-On 2.0
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L
| Capacity | 32 L |
| Weight | 0.9 kg |
| Dimensions | 74×51×18 cm |
| Airline fit | 1% |
| Price | $155 |
Feature by feature
| Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L | Feature | Minaal Carry-On 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 2 | Opening | 0 |
| top | Passport | top |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| Y | Backpack | hideable |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 4 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | Y |
| 2, side | Water Bottle Holder | 1 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 11-oz 100% organic cotton canvas with a PU coating | 600D Cordura |
Minaal Carry-On 2.0
| Capacity | 34 L |
| Weight | 1.4 kg |
| Dimensions | 56×36×21 cm |
| Airline fit | 46% |
| Price | $300 |
Key differences between the Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L and Minaal Carry-On 2.0
- Opening: Rolltop on the Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L; Other on the Minaal Carry-On 2.0.
- Backpack straps: Yes on the Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L; Hideable on the Minaal Carry-On 2.0.
- Main compartments: 3 on the Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L; 4 on the Minaal Carry-On 2.0.
- Rain cover: No on the Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L; Yes on the Minaal Carry-On 2.0.
- Water bottle pockets: 2, side on the Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L; 1 on the Minaal Carry-On 2.0.
Both have: passport pocket, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 1 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L, and 85 accept only the Minaal Carry-On 2.0.
Only the Minaal Carry-On 2.0 fits
Adria Airways, Aegean Airlines, Air Asia, Air Astana, Air Europa, Air Koryo, Air Macau, Air New Zealand, Air Nostrum, Air Tahiti Nui, Air Wisconsin, AirAsiaX, Alaska Airlines, Allegiant Air, American Airlines, Atlas Global, Avianca , Azul Linhas, Bahamasair, Bangkok Airways, Biman Bangladesh, British Airways, Cambodia Angkor Air, Caribbean Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Cebu Pacific, China Airlines, China Southern, CommutAir, Conviasa, Copa Airlines, Cubana de Aviacion, Delta Airlines, Dragonair, EL AL, EVA Air, Finnair, Frontier Airlines, Garuda Indonesia, Hainan Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, Hong Kong Airlines, Iran Aseman Air, Island Air, Jet2, jetBlue Airways, Jetstar Airways, Jetstar Asia, Korean Air, Kulula, Kuwait Air, Malaysia Airlines, Mango, Middle East Airlines, Monarch Airlines, Onur Air, PenAir, Philippine Airlines, Qantas Airways, Republic Airways, Royal Air Morocco, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, SilkAir, Silver Airways, Singapore Airlines, Skywest, Inc., South African Airways, Southwest Airlines, SpiceJet, Spirit Airlines, SriLankan Airlines, Sun Country, TAAG Angola, TAM Airlines, Thai Airways, Trans States, Travel Service Airlines, United Airlines, Ural Airlines, Uzbekistan Air, Vietnam Airlines, Virgin America, Virgin Atlantic, WOW Airlines.
Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L vs. Minaal Carry-On 2.0: which should you pack?
The Minaal Carry-On 2.0 carries 2L more than the Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L (32L vs. 34L), while the Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Minaal Carry-On 2.0 fits 46% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Minaal Carry-On 2.0; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Fieldsmith Roll-Top Pack 32L is the better call.