Osprey Porter 46 vs. Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 3 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| H | Hip Belt | S |
| H | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | S |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | G-1000® Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton |
Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.4 kg |
| Dimensions | 61×28×26 cm |
| Airline fit | 30% |
| Price | $174 |
The Osprey Porter 46 and the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 are both reliable carry on backpacks, perfect for the seasoned traveler or hiker on the go. The main distinguishing features between the two backpacks lie in their dimensions, weight, storage capacity, airline compatibility, material, and laptop compartment size.
Here are the key differences between the two:
- Dimensions: The Osprey Porter 46 measures 23" tall by 36" wide by 56" deep, while the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 is slightly taller and narrower at 26" tall by 28" wide by 61" deep.
- Weight: The Osprey Porter 46 is slightly heavier, weighing in at 1.5 pounds, compared to the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35's 1.4 pounds.
- Storage Capacity: The Osprey Porter 46 boasts an impressive 46 liters of storage capacity, dwarfing the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35's 35 liters.
- Airline Compatibility: The Osprey Porter 46 is compatible with 47% of airlines, while the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 lags behind, compatible with just 30% of airlines.
- Material: The Osprey Porter 46 is made of durable nylon, whereas the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 is crafted from a combination of 65% polyester and 35% cotton G-1000® Eco & HeavyDuty Eco S.
- Laptop Compartment: The Osprey Porter 46 has a laptop compartment that can accommodate a 1" laptop, while the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 does not have a dedicated laptop space.
The Osprey Porter 46 presents an all-rounded, full-fledged carry on backpack with standout attributes such as superior storage capacity and extensive airline compatibility. It also offers a dedicated laptop compartment, making it a great choice for digital nomads.
The Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35, on the other hand, is lighter and sports superior craftsmanship with a durable and eco-friendly construction material. The Fjallraven's ability to compactly fold down when not in use is an intuitive design feature, convenient for travelers with limited storage space. Despite its lesser storage capacity, the Fjallraven offers a well-designed, functional internal organization, including a security pocket.
In summary, if storage capacity, airline compatibility, and laptop convenience rank high on your list, the Osprey Porter 46 may just be your ideal pick. However, if you value lightweight, durability, eco-friendliness, and quality internal organization, the Fjallraven Abisko Hike 35 should be your go-to. Both backpacks marry durability, style and functionality, and the final decision would ultimately depend on personal preference and specific travel needs.