Osprey Porter 46 vs. Arc'Teryx Arro 22

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Osprey Porter 46

Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46
Capacity46 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions56×36×23 cm
Airline fit47%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Osprey Porter 46FeatureArc'Teryx Arro 22
Storage
S Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
H Backpack S
H Hip Belt S
H Sternum Strap S
Inside
1 Laptop 15
3 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
0 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Nylon1260-denier Invista Ballistic Superpack nylon

Arc'Teryx Arro 22

Front facing view of the Arc'Teryx Arro 22
Capacity22 L
Weight0 kg
Dimensions55×30×25 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$180

The Osprey Porter 46 and the Arc'Teryx Arro 22 are a pair of formidable packs, both well-regarded in the carry-on backpack market. Despite their shared purpose, their unique selling points shine. The Porter 46, as its name implies, boasts a sprawling 46 liters of capacity—a behemoth of a backpack meant for those whose travels dictate a larger load. Its nylon construction is a mark of durability, assuring users of its long-lasting quality. Integrated is a laptop compartment, though it merely fits a 1-inch thick device—a puzzling limitation. Reviewers laud it as a tough pack that can bear the weight of many necessities without compromising its structural integrity.

The Arc'Teryx Arro 22, on the other hand, is designed for those seeking a leaner capacity. With a 22-liter capacity, it is less than half of the Porter. However, it does not compromise in other aspects. Crafted from 1260-denier Invista Ballistic Superpack nylon, the Arro 22 is known for its resilience under rigorous conditions. Then, its laptop compartment fits up to a 15-inch device—a considerably wider range than the Porter's. Reviewers claim this pack's fortitude infallibly stands against the weather and rough use, it's comfort levels are highly appraised as well.

Main differences:

Despite the Porter 46's superior capacity and suspension system, it falls short in terms of laptop storage comapared to the Arro 22. The compression strap of the Porter also helps to maintain its shape when fully loaded. Conversely, the Arro 22 shines in terms of its water resistance, comfort, and sleek design. While both packs earn their keep in the carry-on world, their differences underscore the importance of understanding individual needs before purchase. Whether you are a minimalist traveler or a gear-junkie, both the Osprey Porter 46 and Arc'Teryx Arro 22 certainly have their merits.