Osprey Porter 46 vs. Arc'Teryx Arro 22
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Arc'Teryx Arro 22 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | Y |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| 16in | Laptop | 15in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR | 1260-denier Invista Ballistic Superpack nylon |
Arc'Teryx Arro 22
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 0 kg |
| Dimensions | 55×30×25 cm |
| Airline fit | 39% |
| Price | $180 |
Key differences between the Osprey Porter 46 and Arc'Teryx Arro 22
- Compression straps: 2 on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
- Opening: Clamshell on the Osprey Porter 46; Top zip on the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
- Passport pocket: Top on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
- Luggage passthrough: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
- Backpack straps: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; Yes on the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
- Hip belt: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; Yes on the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
- Laptop sleeve: 16in on the Osprey Porter 46; 15in on the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
- Main compartments: 4 on the Osprey Porter 46; 1 on the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
- Built-in organizer: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
- Water bottle pockets: No on the Osprey Porter 46; 2 on the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
Both have: sternum strap, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 61 accept both. 55 accept only the Osprey Porter 46, and 12 accept only the Arc'Teryx Arro 22.
Only the Osprey Porter 46 fits
Aer Lingus, Air Asia, Air Canada, Air Macau, Air Wisconsin, AirAsiaX, Alaska Airlines, Allegiant Air, American Airlines, Austrian, Avianca , Azerbaijan Airlines, Bahamasair, Bangkok Airways, Biman Bangladesh, Brussels Airlines, Cambodia Angkor Air, Cathay Pacific, Cebu Pacific, China Airlines, CommutAir, Delta Airlines, Dragonair, Ethiopian Airlines, Eurowings, EVA Air, Fiji Airways, Flair Air, Garuda Indonesia, Hawaiian Airlines, Hong Kong Airlines, jetBlue Airways, Jetstar Airways, Jetstar Asia, Kulula, LOT Polish, Lufthansa, Mahan Air, Malaysia Airlines, Mango, Mesa Airlines, Norwegian, Porter Airlines, Qantas Airways, Republic Airways, SAS Scandinavian, Skywest, Inc., South African Airways, SriLankan Airlines, Swiss Int'l Air Lines, Trans States, Turkish Airlines, United Airlines, Vietnam Airlines, Virgin Atlantic.
Only the Arc'Teryx Arro 22 fits
Aerolineas Argentinas, Air France, Air India, Air Mauritius, Boliviana de Aviacion, Croatia Air, Indigo, Jet Airways, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Sky Airlines.
The Osprey Porter 46 and the Arc'Teryx Arro 22 are a pair of formidable packs, both well-regarded in the carry-on backpack market. Despite their shared purpose, their unique selling points shine. The Porter 46, as its name implies, boasts a sprawling 46 liters of capacity—a behemoth of a backpack meant for those whose travels dictate a larger load. Its nylon construction is a mark of durability, assuring users of its long-lasting quality. Integrated is a laptop compartment, though it merely fits a 1-inch thick device—a puzzling limitation. Reviewers laud it as a tough pack that can bear the weight of many necessities without compromising its structural integrity.
The Arc'Teryx Arro 22, on the other hand, is designed for those seeking a leaner capacity. With a 22-liter capacity, it is less than half of the Porter. However, it does not compromise in other aspects. Crafted from 1260-denier Invista Ballistic Superpack nylon, the Arro 22 is known for its resilience under rigorous conditions. Then, its laptop compartment fits up to a 15-inch device—a considerably wider range than the Porter's. Reviewers claim this pack's fortitude infallibly stands against the weather and rough use, it's comfort levels are highly appraised as well.
Main differences:
- Osprey Porter 46's measurements are approximately 23" x 36" x 56". The Arc'Teryx Arro 22's are roughly 25" x 30" x 55".
- The Porter 46 weighs 1.5 pounds, while the Arro 22 does not add to the carrier's burden.
- The Porter 46 has a robust 46-liter capacity. The Arro 22's is a more restrained 22-liter.
- Both backpacks are compatible with 47% of airlines.
- The Porter 46 is constructed from nylon, while the Arro 22 utilizes 1260-denier Invista Ballistic Superpack nylon.
- The Porter 46's laptop compartment can fit a 1-inch laptop. The Arro 22 houses up to a 15-inch laptop.
Despite the Porter 46's superior capacity and suspension system, it falls short in terms of laptop storage comapared to the Arro 22. The compression strap of the Porter also helps to maintain its shape when fully loaded. Conversely, the Arro 22 shines in terms of its water resistance, comfort, and sleek design. While both packs earn their keep in the carry-on world, their differences underscore the importance of understanding individual needs before purchase. Whether you are a minimalist traveler or a gear-junkie, both the Osprey Porter 46 and Arc'Teryx Arro 22 certainly have their merits.