Osprey Porter 46 vs. Fjallraven Travel Pack
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Fjallraven Travel Pack |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 1 |
| N | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | H |
| H | Hip Belt | N |
| H | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 2 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton |
Fjallraven Travel Pack
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.65 kg |
| Dimensions | 46×32×27 cm |
| Airline fit | 30% |
| Price | $225 |
Osprey Porter 46 vs Fjallraven Travel Pack
Whether you're going on an epic adventure or a city break, a high-quality backpack makes all the difference. Two top-notch options are the Osprey Porter 46 and the Fjallraven Travel Pack.
The Osprey Porter 46 is a monster of a pack, a robust backpack that won’t bow under the pressure of heavy loads. Whether you're jetting off on an extended trip or need a reliable bag for adventures closer to home, the Porter 46 delivers. It has the most generous capacity of the two with a sturdy Nylon construction and seemingly endless pockets to keep your gear organised. Its compatibility with a wide range of airlines also makes it a handy companion for those who frequent the skies.
The Fjallraven Travel Pack treads a more gentle path into the heart of travellers. Somehow managing to merge simplicity with a hefty dose of functionality, it doesn't have the same capacity as the Porter 46. Nevertheless, it has a pedigree in high-class organisations. A design that includes a padded laptop section, and numerous pockets, combined with a classy aesthetic, appeals to the meticulous planner in all of us.
- Dimensions: Osprey is 23x36x56 (inches); Fjallraven is 27x32x46
- Weight: Osprey weighs 1.5 pounds; Fjallraven weighs 1.65
- Capacity: Osprey holds 46 liters; Fjallraven holds 35
- Airlines compatibility: Osprey is compatible with 47% of airlines; Fjallraven with 30%
- Material: The Osprey is made of Nylon; The Fjallraven of G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton
- Laptop compartment: Osprey fits a 17" laptop; Fjallraven fits a 15" model
The views of reviewers also reflect this. The Porter 46 receives praise for its durability, versatility, and overall value for money. On the flip side, the Fjallraven Travel Pack is often lauded for its comfort, style, and excellent organisation.
In essence, the Porter 46 and the Travel Pack both come with their unique perks. You can't go wrong with either, but your ultimate choice might just come down to the type of traveller you are. The Porter 46 looks like it could thrive in the jungle as well as the city streets. In contrast, the Travel Pack seems more at home navigating the aisles of an overhead locker and exploring the avenues of a new city.