Osprey Porter 46 vs. Fjallraven Splitpack
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Fjallraven Splitpack |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 1 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| H | Hip Belt | N |
| H | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton |
Fjallraven Splitpack
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.15 kg |
| Dimensions | 48×28×28 cm |
| Airline fit | 30% |
| Price | $200 |
Two carry on backpacks, the Osprey Porter 46 and Fjallraven Splitpack, are competing for traveler's attention. Each offers distinct features designed for different travel needs. Let's take a closer look.
The Osprey Porter 46 boasts an impressive 46 liters of capacity stowed inside a 23-inch-tall, 36-inch-wide, 56-inch-deep nylon shell. This backpack is a good deal with its sturdy construction, compatibility with 47% of airlines, and additional features like a laptop compartment that could fit a 1 inch laptop. It's a bag designed with the urban traveler in mind - spacious, quick to pack and unpack, and lightweight for its size.
In comparison, the Fjallraven Splitpack packs 35 liters of capacity into a 28-inch-tall, 48-inch-wide, 28-inch-deep design. And it does it with style and craftsmanship, using a sturdy and eco-friendly G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton. Although compatible with fewer airlines, 30% to be exact, it has its distinct advantages. The Fjallraven Splitpack doesn't have a laptop compartment, but its innovative design and versatility to be used as a duffle bag or a backpack make it a great choice.
In summary, here are the differences:
- The Osprey Porter 46 is bigger but lighter, the Fjallraven Splitpack is smaller but heavier.
- The Osprey Porter 46 has more capacity – 46 liters, compared to the Fjallraven Splitpack's 35 liters.
- The Osprey Porter 46 is compatible with more airlines – 47%, vs the Fjallraven Splitpack's 30%.
- The Osprey Porter 46 has a laptop compartment that can fit a 1 inch laptop, while the Fjallraven Splitpack lacks this feature.
- The materials they are made of are different- the Osprey Porter 46 is made of nylon, the Fjallraven Splitpack of G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco.
Each backpack brings its unique strengths to the table - the Osprey Porter 46 with its spaciousness and convenience; the Fjallraven Splitpack with its stylish design, robustness, and versatility. Which one is "better" really depends on the needs of the traveler. The choice, as they say, is yours.