Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Exped Serac 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 2 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| H | Hip Belt | R |
| H | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | 400 D HD ripstop nylon, TPU film laminated, 10'000 mm water column |
When looking at carry-on backpacks, size, weight, and storage capacity all play significant roles. The Osprey Porter 46, a well-known brand in travel and outdoor gear, certainly caters to those looking for a larger bag. Measuring at 23 by 36 by 56 inches and capable of carrying 46 liters, there is little doubt this bag can handle some serious gear. And at 1.5 pounds, it's not overly burdening. But special attention should be paid to this backpack's compatibility with airlines. It fits carrier regulations for 47% of airlines, meaning over half will require it to be checked.
On the other hand, the Exped Serac 35 is a trimmer choice. It shares the same height as the Osprey at 23 inches, but is more slender in width and depth. With 35 liters of capacity, it's more suited to the minimalist traveler. Weighing less than a pound (.82 to be exact), it takes the cake for being light on your back. Its compatibility with airlines falls short, however, accepted by only 30%.
The materials used in these bags showcase their intended uses. The Osprey Porter 46 uses durable nylon suited for urban travel, whereas the Exped Serac 35 is made from 400D HD ripstop nylon, TPU film laminated, with a 10,000 mm water column—ensuring a level of weatherproofing that's perfect for outdoor excursions. The Osprey Porter 46 is a standout option for tech-savvy travelers, sporting a laptop compartment that can fit a 1" laptop. The Exped Serac 35, however, lacks this feature.
Despite their differences, both backpacks boast positive reviewer feedback. Reviewers highlight the Porter 46's big capacity, gear-hauling capabilities, and its value for the price. Meanwhile, the Exped Serac 35 received praise for its weatherproof construction and durability, enjoying favor for alpine missions and ski mountaineering expeditions.