Osprey Porter 46 vs. Fjallraven Greenland Top Large
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Fjallraven Greenland Top Large |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 16in | Laptop | 15in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR | G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton |
Fjallraven Greenland Top Large
| Capacity | 30 L |
| Weight | 0.8 kg |
| Dimensions | 52×28×18 cm |
| Airline fit | 89% |
| Price | $150 |
Key differences between the Osprey Porter 46 and Fjallraven Greenland Top Large
- Compression straps: 2 on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
- Opening: Clamshell on the Osprey Porter 46; Top zip on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
- Passport pocket: Top on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
- Luggage passthrough: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
- Backpack straps: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; Yes on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
- Hip belt: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
- Sternum strap: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
- Laptop sleeve: 16in on the Osprey Porter 46; 15in on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
- Main compartments: 4 on the Osprey Porter 46; 1 on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
- Built-in organizer: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
- Water bottle pockets: No on the Osprey Porter 46; 2 on the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
Both have: water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 116 accept both. 0 accept only the Osprey Porter 46, and 52 accept only the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
Only the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large fits
Aerolineas Argentinas, Air Baltic, Air China, Air France, Air India, Air Malta, Air Mauritius, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Blue Air, Boliviana de Aviacion, Bulgaria Air, Cayman Airways, China Eastern, Croatia Air, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, flybe, Great Lakes Airlines, Icelandair, Indigo, InselAir, Jet Airways, Juneyao Airlines, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Liat Airlines, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Pakistan International, Royal Brunei Airlines, Ryanair, S7, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sky Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Volotea, WestJet, Xiamen.
The backpack is a traveler's trusty companion, and finding the right one hinges upon many factors. Osprey and Fjallraven are two brands well-known for their dedication to durable and functional gear. So let's consider two of their standout carry-on backpacks: the Osprey Porter 46 and the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.
The Osprey Porter 46 is a rugged giant. Boasting 46 liters of capacity, this pack is constructed from robust nylon and designed like a deluxe duffel bag that can be hauled from its top or side handles. It's taller and wider than its counterpart, coming in at 23 inches tall, 36 inches wide, and 56 inches deep. Its size might make it a bit chunky but its clamshell opening and compression strap make packing not only simple but tidy. Plus, it has a laptop compartment that fits a 1-inch laptop.
The Fjallraven Greenland Top Large, on the other hand, is a svelte and eco-friendly alternative. Crafted from G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S material (65% polyester and 35% cotton), this pack is lighter and more airline-compatible than the Osprey. Its dimensions are 18 inches tall, 28 inches wide, and 52 inches deep. It may feature less capacity (30 liters) but its size and weight (0.8 pounds) make it a nimble companion. As for tech storage, it features a laptop compartment that fits a 15-inch laptop.
Quick Comparison:
- The Osprey is more cumbersome yet offers remarkably more space.
- The Fjallraven is lighter and more comfortable even while being smaller.
- The Fjallraven's materials are eco-friendly and it's more airplane-friendly.
- The Osprey features a bigger laptop compartment and overall versatility.
In sum, choosing between the Osprey Porter 46 and the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large boils down to personal preferences and needs. If durability and capacity are more of a priority, the Porter 46 is the better choice. On the other hand, for those prioritizing airplane compatibility, comfort, and eco-friendliness, the Fjallraven treads ahead. Your ideal "back" companion awaits you in one of these two stellar backpacks.