Osprey Porter 46 vs. Ortlieb Atrack ST
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Ortlieb Atrack ST |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 4 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| H | Hip Belt | S |
| H | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | PS33 |
Ortlieb Atrack ST
| Capacity | 25 L |
| Weight | 1.41 kg |
| Dimensions | 56×26×25 cm |
| Airline fit | 38% |
| Price | $250 |
The Osprey Porter 46 and the Ortlieb Atrack ST are two noteworthy carry-on backpacks sitting within the same price bracket but offering considerably different features to their users.
The Osprey Porter 46 is designed to be a sizable, gear-hauling pack, with a generous 46 liters of capacity. It's substantial enough to handle a hefty travel load, and as one reviewer says, you can "bulk it up or cinch it down." This makes it a popular choice among frequent travellers who value the need for ample space. Aside from its roomy features, it also offers good suspension and is known for its lightweight, yet strong and durable construction, made from robust nylon. According to a number of reviews, it comfortably handles rough handling and adverse weather conditions.
Now, let's consider the Ortlieb Atrack ST. While it offers a noticeably smaller capacity at 25 liters, it is still an impressively designed carry-on backpack. Its weatherproof construction and multiple attachment points position it as a versatile option for adventurous travels. Critics rave about its intuitive and comfortable suspension system and the functional add-ons that can be integrated into the design. Unlike the Porter, it suits those with shorter torsos better and is an excellent choice for a traveler preparing for diverse weather conditions and needing to pack versatile gear.
In a quick comparison:
- Osprey Porter 46 is larger (46 liters) vs Ortlieb Atrack ST (25 liters)
- The Porter (1.5 pounds) is slightly heavier than the Atrack (1.41 pounds)
- Porter is compatible with more airlines (47% vs 38%)
- The Porter is made of durable Nylon while the Atrack features a weatherproof PS33 material
- The Porter accommodates a 1-inch laptop, but the Atrack lacks a dedicated laptop compartment.
In the battle between the Osprey Porter 46 vs Ortlieb Atrack ST, both bags bring unique strengths to the table. A buyer's personal use and travel habits will be the determining factor. The Porter works great for uniform, urban travel with its generous space and laptop compartment, while the Atrack, with its weatherproof design and multiple attachment points, would be a better pick for adventurous souls. Each equates to travel versatility in its own right, but the choice ultimately resides with the users' individual needs and preferences.