Osprey Porter 46 vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Osprey Porter 46

Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46
Capacity46 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions55×36×23 cm
Airline fit61%
Price$185

Feature by feature

Osprey Porter 46Featureebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack
Storage
2 Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
top Passport N
Y Passthrough N
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
hideable Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap N
Inside
16in Laptop N
4 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWRBallistic Nylon

ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Front facing view of the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack
Capacity0 L
Weight4.1 kg
Dimensions55×34×20 cm
Airline fit86%
Price$300

Key differences between the Osprey Porter 46 and ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Both have: backpack straps, built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 116 accept both. 0 accept only the Osprey Porter 46, and 47 accept only the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack.

Only the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack fits

Aerolineas Argentinas, Air Baltic, Air China, Air France, Air India, Air Malta, Air Mauritius, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Blue Air, Boliviana de Aviacion, Bulgaria Air, Cayman Airways, China Eastern, Croatia Air, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, flybe, Icelandair, Indigo, InselAir, Jet Airways, Juneyao Airlines, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Pakistan International, Royal Brunei Airlines, Ryanair, S7, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sky Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Volotea, Xiamen.

The Osprey Porter 46 and the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack both promise to be dependable carry-on options for the modern traveler. Integrated into the design of these backpacks are ergonomic features that blend comfort with functionality. Despite these similarities, these travel backpacks diverge significantly in terms of their specifications and utility.

The Osprey Porter 46 is a lightweight yet strong contender in the backpack world. Weighing in at just 1.5 pounds, this backpack boasts the capacity to store 46 liters' worth of gear, while still compacting neatly into dimensions approved by 47% of airlines. Osprey has opted for robust, durable nylon fabric with this backpack, ensuring it can weather anything from city commutes to arduous treks. However, authority still lies with the Luxon Rolling Travel, compatible with 97% of airlines and providing a laptop compartment, too. Here, eBags has shown a decided focus on organization and structure.

The ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack is a versatile and robust backpack. It's 20 inches tall, 34 inches wide, and 55 inches deep. Although slightly smaller, it certainly won’t weigh you down, coming in at 4.1 pounds. The Luxon is made of Ballistic Nylon, known for its endurance under challenging conditions. Despite the lack of stated capacity, it promises to offer adequate storage space. One of its defining features is the airline compatibility: the Luxon can travel comfortably aboard 97% of all airlines.

Reviewers, too, have offered their stamp of approval. For the Osprey Porter 46, accolades have recognized its "old-school backpacker look," impressive storage capacity, and excellent value. The eBags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack, too, has been praised for its internal organization, convertible usage options, and easy packing/unpacking process. In final analysis, both backpacks offer unique features suitable for varied traveler needs. Vibing with the frequent flyer? Bet on the eBags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack. Planning heavy-duty trips? The Osprey Porter 46 might be your best companion.