Osprey Porter 46 vs. STM Grace

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Osprey Porter 46

Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46
Capacity46 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions55×36×23 cm
Airline fit61%
Price$185

Feature by feature

Osprey Porter 46FeatureSTM Grace
Storage
2 Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 4
top Passport N
Y Passthrough N
Carry
hideable Backpack Y
hideable Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap N
Inside
16in Laptop 15in
4 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR100% polyester

STM Grace

by Stm
Front facing view of the STM Grace
Capacity20 L
Weight0.6 kg
Dimensions42×29×11 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$100

Key differences between the Osprey Porter 46 and STM Grace

Both have: built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 116 accept both. 0 accept only the Osprey Porter 46, and 64 accept only the STM Grace.

Only the STM Grace fits

Aerolineas Argentinas, Air Baltic, Air China, Air France, Air India, Air Malta, Air Mauritius, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Boliviana de Aviacion, Bulgaria Air, Cayman Airways, China Eastern, Croatia Air, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Etihad Airways, flybe, Gulf Air, Icelandair, Indigo, InselAir, Jet Airways, Juneyao Airlines, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Liat Airlines, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Oman Air, Pakistan International, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Royal Jordanian, Ryanair, S7, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sky Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, Volotea, WestJet, Xiamen.

When delving into the world of travel backpacks, two notable names emerge – the Osprey Porter 46 and the STM Grace. Let's dive in and compare these two contenders to help you decide which is ideally suited to your needs.

Starting with the mammoth of a backpack - the Osprey Porter 46. This bag is famous for its sheer capacity, packing a generous 46 liters into its rugged nylon shell. It's hefty in size, towering at 23 inches with a wide diameter of 36 inches. Despite its size, it's surprisingly lightweight at just 1.5 pounds. Specifically designed for the heavy packer, it includes a laptop compartment that can snugly fit a 1-inch laptop and boasts compatibility with 47% of airlines. Reviewers rave about its durability, usefulness, and smart features making it a reliable option for the urban traveler.

Versus this, the STM Grace is quite the contrast. It offers a simpler design with a more minimalistic aesthetic. It's significantly smaller, yet efficient, with a capacity of 20 liters within its 100% polyester body. More airline-friendly than the Porter 46, it's compatible with 84% of airlines and includes a pocket that can accommodate a 15-inch laptop. Weighing only 0.6 pounds, it's an ultra-lightweight option that still offers a robust internal organization system, ideal for those who prefer to travel light.

Comparison Summary:

In the end, the decision all boils down to your specific travel needs. The Osprey Porter 46 is an excellent choice if you're looking for spaciousness, durability, and useful features. In contrast, if you prefer light travelling and need an airline-friendly backpack with thoughtful internal organization - the STM Grace might just be the perfect fit. Both are well-reviewed and offer value in their niches. The choice, as they say, is in your hands, along with the backpack, hopefully.