Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Vancropak Travel Backpack |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 1 |
| N | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | H |
| H | Hip Belt | N |
| H | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 17 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 2 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | Polyester Farbric |
| Capacity | 40 L |
| Weight | 0.9 kg |
| Dimensions | 51×36×18 cm |
| Airline fit | 98% |
The Osprey Porter 46 and the Vancropak Travel Backpack are two of the most popular carry on backpack options in the market. They both serve the same fundamental purpose - carry your essentials while you travel, but do so in significantly different ways. The Porter 46 by Osprey bit more of a heavy-duty pack, with a capacity of an impressive 46 liters and weighing in at 1.5 pounds. On the other hand, our friend from Vancropak weighs slightly less at 0.9 pounds and offers a modest 40 liters capacity.
Now let's boil down their uniqueness in a list:
Despite their obvious differences, both backpacks come loaded with features that are specifically targeted at making travel more comfortable. The Osprey Porter 46 comes with offers good suspension and has a clamshell opening for faster packing and unpacking. The touted compressions strap also prevents the bag from looking sloppy according to users.
Vancropak doesn't want to be left out in the cold either. It's known for its TSA zipper lock to keep your belongings safe and a ventilated back to prevent you from sweating during long hauls†. So if you are looking for a great value proposition and a bag that can withstand anything, the Osprey Porter 46 might be your best bet. But if airline compatibility and lighter weight are high on your list, then the Vancropak Travel Backpack will not disappoint you.
At the end of the day, both backpacks have their strengths and potential areas for improvement, and it ultimately depends on what you as a user prioritize for your travels. Happy packing!