Osprey Porter 46 vs. Exped Mountain Pro 40 Women

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Osprey Porter 46

Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46
Capacity46 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions55×36×23 cm
Airline fit61%
Price$185

Feature by feature

Osprey Porter 46FeatureExped Mountain Pro 40 Women
Storage
2 Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 4
top Passport N
Y Passthrough N
Carry
hideable Backpack Y
hideable Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
16in Laptop N
4 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR420 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 3'000 mm water column

Exped Mountain Pro 40 Women

Front facing view of the Exped Mountain Pro 40 Women
Capacity40 L
Weight0.2 kg
Dimensions62×29×24 cm
Airline fit13%
Price$190

Key differences between the Osprey Porter 46 and Exped Mountain Pro 40 Women

Both have: sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 24 accept both. 92 accept only the Osprey Porter 46, and 0 accept only the Exped Mountain Pro 40 Women.

Only the Osprey Porter 46 fits

Aegean Airlines, Aer Lingus, Aeroflot, Aeromexico, Air Asia, Air Astana, Air Canada, Air Caraibes, Air Macau, Air Nostrum, Air Wisconsin, AirAsiaX, Alaska Airlines, All Nipon Airways, Allegiant Air, American Airlines, ANA, Atlas Global, Austrian, Avianca , Azerbaijan Airlines, Bahamasair, Bangkok Airways, Biman Bangladesh, British Airways, Brussels Airlines, Cambodia Angkor Air, Caribbean Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Cebu Pacific, China Airlines, CommutAir, Conviasa, Copa Airlines, Czech Airlines, Delta Airlines, Dragonair, EL AL, Ethiopian Airlines, Eurowings, EVA Air, Fiji Airways, Finnair, Flair Air, Frontier Airlines, Garuda Indonesia, Gol Linhas Aereas, Hawaiian Airlines, Hong Kong Airlines, Iberia, Interjet, Iran Air, Iran Aseman Air, Japan Airlines, Jet2, jetBlue Airways, Jetstar Airways, Jetstar Asia, Kulula, Kuwait Air, LOT Polish, Lufthansa, Mahan Air, Malaysia Airlines, Mango, Mesa Airlines, Middle East Airlines, Monarch Airlines, Norwegian, Onur Air, Peach, PenAir, Porter Airlines, Qantas Airways, Republic Airways, SAS Scandinavian, Skywest, Inc., South African Airways, Southwest Airlines, Spirit Airlines, SriLankan Airlines, Sun Country, Swiss Int'l Air Lines, Thai Airways, Trans States, Travel Service Airlines, Turkish Airlines, United Airlines, Uzbekistan Air, Vietnam Airlines, Virgin Atlantic, WOW Airlines.

Thus we have the Osprey Porter 46 and the Exped Mountain Pro 40 Women on the table, two of the finest carry-on backpacks you can lay your hands on. Both share a common purpose, but they also differ in certain aspects. Let's dive into specifics. The Osprey Porter 46 is a large, spacious backpack built with the urban traveler in its viewfinder. Made from nylon, it has an impressive 46 litres capacity and a laptop compartment that can fit a 1-inch laptop. With a weight of 1.5 pounds, it boasts compatibility with 47% of airlines worldwide.

The Exped Mountain Pro 40 Women, on the other hand, flaunts a lightweight design, weighing just 0.2 pounds. This backpack, specifically designed for women, is built from durable 420D Oxford nylon, which is PU coated ensuring waterproofing. It has a capacity of 40 litres, it's slightly smaller than the Porter 46, but is compatible with 89% of airlines. One drawback is that it doesn't have a laptop compartment.

Here are key differences:

Let's give heed to some outspoken consumers. One reviewer praised the Porter 46, stating, "For better or worse, the Osprey Porter 46 is a big pack with a big capacity. Bulk it up or cinch it down, the Porter is a durable option for those who tend to carry more." Another customer added, "This bag is the real deal... if you are looking for a mid-sized bag with great organization and an old-school backpacker look… this may be the backpack of your dreams."

On the Mountain Pro 40 side, users praised it for its lightweight yet sturdy construction. Its optimal design for the female body and outdoor-friendly features, including weatherproof build, attachment points for outdoor gears, and a removable document bag, make it a standout choice despite its smaller size. Ultimately, it boils down to individual preference, travel requirements, and how you roll. Both backpacks are excellent choices but shine differently depending on the context.