Osprey Porter 46 vs. Deuter Aviant Voyager 65+10

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Osprey Porter 46

Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46
Capacity46 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions55×36×23 cm
Airline fit61%
Price$185

Feature by feature

Osprey Porter 46FeatureDeuter Aviant Voyager 65+10
Storage
2 Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 3
top Passport N
Y Passthrough N
Carry
hideable Backpack Y
hideable Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
16in Laptop 13in
4 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR600D PES, 420D PA

Deuter Aviant Voyager 65+10

Front facing view of the Deuter Aviant Voyager 65+10
Capacity65 L
Weight2.83 kg
Dimensions82×32×28 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$208

Key differences between the Osprey Porter 46 and Deuter Aviant Voyager 65+10

Both have: water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 1 accept both. 115 accept only the Osprey Porter 46, and 0 accept only the Deuter Aviant Voyager 65+10.

Only the Osprey Porter 46 fits

Adria Airways, Aegean Airlines, Aer Lingus, Aeroflot, Aeromexico, Air Asia, Air Astana, Air Canada, Air Caraibes, Air Europa, Air Koryo, Air Macau, Air New Zealand, Air Nostrum, Air Tahiti Nui, Air Wisconsin, AirAsiaX, Alaska Airlines, All Nipon Airways, Allegiant Air, American Airlines, ANA, Atlas Global, Austrian, Avianca , Azerbaijan Airlines, Azul Linhas, Bahamasair, Bangkok Airways, Biman Bangladesh, British Airways, Brussels Airlines, Cambodia Angkor Air, Caribbean Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Cebu Pacific, China Airlines, China Southern, CommutAir, Conviasa, Copa Airlines, Cubana de Aviacion, Czech Airlines, Delta Airlines, Dragonair, EL AL, Ethiopian Airlines, Eurowings, EVA Air, Fiji Airways, Finnair, Flair Air, Frontier Airlines, Garuda Indonesia, Gol Linhas Aereas, Hainan Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, Hong Kong Airlines, Iberia, Interjet, Iran Air, Iran Aseman Air, Island Air, Japan Airlines, Jet2, jetBlue Airways, Jetstar Airways, Jetstar Asia, Korean Air, Kulula, Kuwait Air, LOT Polish, Lufthansa, Mahan Air, Malaysia Airlines, Mango, Mesa Airlines, Middle East Airlines, Monarch Airlines, Norwegian, Onur Air, Peach, PenAir, Philippine Airlines, Porter Airlines, Qantas Airways, Republic Airways, Royal Air Morocco, SAS Scandinavian, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, SilkAir, Silver Airways, Singapore Airlines, Skywest, Inc., South African Airways, Southwest Airlines, SpiceJet, Spirit Airlines, SriLankan Airlines, Sun Country, Swiss Int'l Air Lines, TAAG Angola, TAM Airlines, Thai Airways, Trans States, Travel Service Airlines, Turkish Airlines, United Airlines, Ural Airlines, Uzbekistan Air, Vietnam Airlines, Virgin America, Virgin Atlantic, WOW Airlines.

The Osprey Porter 46 and the Deuter Aviant Voyager 65+10, two titans in the realm of carry-on backpacks, each hold their own unique leverage. Encased in resilient nylon, the Osprey Porter 46 is a formidable companion with a studious blend of size and practicability. On the other hand, fabricated from 600D PES and 420D PA, the Deuter Aviant Voyager 65+10 looms larger, promising an alluring excess of capacity.

For quick comparisons, glance over the bullet points below:

Quoting a reviewer here, "For better or worse, the Osprey Porter 46 is a big pack with a big capacity." It's sportive and spacious, ideal for those who thrive on organization. Furthermore, it is noted for its noteworthy features meant for the urban wanderer, all at an unavoidable value. The clamshell opening allows easy packing and unpacking, and its compression straps ensure a tidy appearance.

On the flip side, the Deuter Aviant Voyager 65+10, being larger, swoops in with superior capacity. This could appease those with a bigger appetite for packing. Notably, despite its bulky presence, the Deuter Aviant is adept at accommodating a 13-inch laptop, unlike the Osprey model, making it an enticing pick for tech-savvy travelers. However, its heavier burden and lesser airline compatibility might make some travelers pause.

In conclusion, it boils down to what you prioritize in your travel partner, whether it be weight, capacity, or in-flight compatibility. May your choice serve as your reliable accomplice in your future expeditions.