Osprey Porter 46 vs. Exped Glissade 35
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Exped Glissade 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 4 |
| N | Passport | |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| H | Hip Belt | R |
| H | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | |
| Material | |
| Nylon | 630 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water column Oeko-Tex 100 certified |
The Osprey Porter 46 and the Exped Glissade 35 are both highly functional backpacks with high-quality design and durability. Each serves a particular set of needs, offering specific features that the other might not. Whether you're looking for a pack capable of carrying larger loads, or one that is lighter and more compact, these two products have their unique attributes that cater to a wide range of preferences.
The Osprey Porter 46, clocking in at 1.5 pounds, is composed of sturdy Nylon material. It provides ample storage with its 46-liter capacity. Additionally, it accommodates a laptop of up to 1 inch. With a wide dimension of 23x36x56 inches, it is compatible with 47% of airlines; however, its bulk and weight could be an issue to some travelers. On the other hand, the Exped Glissade 35 made from a 630 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, is impressively lightweight at just 0.2 pounds. It features a smaller capacity of 35 liters and is unfortunately incapable of housing a laptop. However, it's greater compatibility with airlines (91%) and marginally taller yet narrower build (24x30x57 inches) makes it an excellent alternative for the more weight-conscious traveller.
- The Osprey Porter 46 is bigger, has a greater capacity but is heavier
- The Exped Glissade 35 is smaller, lighter but lacks laptop storage
- Both have different material composition, with the Exped Glissade 35 being water-resistant
- The Exped Glissade is more airline-friendly
Overall, the Osprey Porter 46 seems best suited for individuals who tend to carry more during their travels, as its substantial capacity and laptop storage are designed to accommodate significant loads. One reviewer describes it as, "a real deal" with "great organization and an old-school backpacker look." On the other hand, The Exped Glissade 35 targets users who prefer minimal weight and excellent mobility, offering a superb harness and load management system. As one reviewer puts it, despite its smaller capacity, it is "lightweight yet highly durable."
In conclusion, both the Osprey Porter 46 and the Exped Glissade 35 come highly-recommended, depending on your specific travel needs and preferences. Both are offering durability and comfortability with slight variations in weight, capacity, and design, both these backpacks can handle your adventuring needs. Keep your itinerary, equipment, and carrying comfort in mind when choosing between these two capable backpacks.