Osprey Porter 46 vs. Jansport Far Out 65
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Jansport Far Out 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 3 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| H | Hip Belt | S |
| H | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | 700 Denier Recycled Ripstop Poly |
Jansport Far Out 65
| Capacity | 65 L |
| Weight | 1.9 kg |
| Dimensions | 68×33×19 cm |
| Airline fit | 18% |
| Price | $120 |
Let's talk backpacks, adventure enthusiasts. First up, we've got the Osprey Porter 46, a sizeable beast of a pack, renowned for its shear capacity and undeniable durability. When fully bulked up, this Packers QB-sized travel companion stands a mighty 23 inches tall, daring to stretch to 36 inches in width and 56 inches in the abyss we call depth. Still, despite this impressive size, the Porter 46 tips the scales at a mere 1.5 pounds. Remarkable, right? But hold up, this bag's sturdiness doesn't end at its feather-light weight. Nay - it comes sheathed in a suit of strong nylon armor, ready to take on your travel-induced beatings.
Enter the Jansport Far Out 65, a surprisingly light, albeit, larger contender in the carry-on backpack arena. Standing 19 inches tall, 33 inches wide and stretching up to 68 inches deep, it offers ample space for all your gear - 65 liters, to be exact. Weighing only slightly more at 1.9 pounds, its construction is still robust, thanks to its 700 Denier Recycled Ripstop Poly skin.
Here's a swift rundown:
- Size: The Osprey Porter 46 is taller but narrower and less deep than the Jansport Far Out 65.
- Weight: The Porter 46 is lighter by 0.4 pounds.
- Capacity: The Far Out 65 bag trumps with a whopping 65 liters over 46 liters.
- Airline Compatibility: Porter 46 fit more airlines' criteria at a compatibility of 47%, as compared to 18% for Far Out 65.
- Material: The Porter 46 is made of Nylon, while its competitor sports a more rugged 700 Denier Recycled Ripstop Poly composition.
- Laptop Compartment: Porter's laptop compartment fits a 1 inch laptop, while the Far out 65 accommodates laptops up to 15 inches.
Here's what some other folks have to say about the Porter 46. One satisfied customer dubbed it "a durable option for those who tend to carry more... a big pack with a big capacity." Another praised its ability to be carried by its side or top handles, and how it can bulk up or be cinched down. A third review summed it up as a "phenomenal product" and the "backpack of your dreams". The final review came from a value-conscious adventurist who felt the Porter 46 offers smart features, making it an "excellent value".
On the flipside, praise for the Jansport Far Out 65 primarily centers around its comfortable harness system and functional removable aluminum bar that doubles as a skewer or bottle opener. Their appreciation also extends to its multiple attachment points and sleeping bag compartment.
So, it's robust Osprey Porter 46 versus the spacious Jansport Far Out 65. Both are great companions for voyagers. Your call, my friend.