Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Timbuk2 Aviator |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 0 |
| N | Passport | |
| N | Passthrough | |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | |
| H | Hip Belt | |
| H | Sternum Strap | |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 0 |
| N | Organizer | |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | |
| Y | Water Resistant | |
| Material | |
| Nylon | |
The Osprey Porter 46 by Osprey and the Timbuk2 Aviator by Thule are both commendable carry-on backpack options. They both offer excellent durability and construction meant for the long haul - made for those who live their lives on the move, across cities or continents. Each has its wide range of positives and unique selling points, but also features that set them apart.
The Osprey Porter 46 is larger in size and lighter in weight than its counterpart, the Timbuk2 Aviator. However, the Aviator, despite being slightly heavier and smaller in size, wins points for wider compatibility with airlines (91% compared to Porter's 47%). The Porter 46 also comes equipped with a laptop compartment, unlike the Aviator. The choice boils down to what matters most to you, be it airline compatibility, weight, size, or specific features like a laptop compartment.
Comparison:
Height, Width, and Depth: The Osprey Porter 46 measures 23x36x56 inches while the Timbuk2 Aviator measures 24x58x39 inches.
Weight: The Porter 46 weighs 1.5 pounds, whereas the Aviator weighs 2 pounds.
Capacity: The Porter 46 offers 46 liters of capacity compared to Aviator's 30 liters.
Airline Compatibility: The Porter 46 is compatible with 47% of airlines, while the Aviator is compatible with 91% of airlines.
Material: The Porter 46 is made of Nylon.
Laptop Compartment: The Porter 46 has a laptop compartment, but the Aviator does not.
Reviews about the Porter 46 reveal much admiration for this big capacious backpack, praising its durability and its versatility as a deluxe duffel or a portable backpack. It is the choice for those seeking a mid-sized bag — durable and comfortable — designed with the urban traveler in mind. However, the absence of review comments on the Aviator leaves some questions to be answered - what highlights and flaws does it hide?
The Porter 46 is a top choice, and not without reason. It provides excellent suspension, has ample storage space, and its construction ensures that your gear remains safe. Moreover, it's lightweight despite its size, making it a delight to carry around. The easy clamshell opening allows for convenient packing and unpacking, and the compression strap ensures your bag never looks sloppy, regardless of how much you stuff inside. The decision, however, is yours to make — comparing and weighing the trade-offs between the Aviator and the Porter 46.