Osprey Porter 46 vs. Exped Transit 40
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Exped Transit 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 2 | Compression | Y |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 0 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| hideable | Backpack | removable |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| 16in | Laptop | N |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR | 840 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water column Oeko-Tex 100 certified |
Key differences between the Osprey Porter 46 and Exped Transit 40
- Compression straps: 2 on the Osprey Porter 46; Yes on the Exped Transit 40.
- Opening: Clamshell on the Osprey Porter 46; Other on the Exped Transit 40.
- Passport pocket: Top on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Exped Transit 40.
- Luggage passthrough: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Exped Transit 40.
- Backpack straps: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; Removable on the Exped Transit 40.
- Hip belt: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Exped Transit 40.
- Laptop sleeve: 16in on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Exped Transit 40.
- Main compartments: 4 on the Osprey Porter 46; 1 on the Exped Transit 40.
- Built-in organizer: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Exped Transit 40.
Both have: sternum strap, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 10 accept both. 106 accept only the Osprey Porter 46, and 0 accept only the Exped Transit 40.
Only the Osprey Porter 46 fits
Aegean Airlines, Aer Lingus, Aeroflot, Aeromexico, Air Asia, Air Astana, Air Canada, Air Caraibes, Air Europa, Air Koryo, Air Macau, Air Nostrum, Air Tahiti Nui, Air Wisconsin, AirAsiaX, Alaska Airlines, All Nipon Airways, Allegiant Air, American Airlines, ANA, Atlas Global, Austrian, Avianca , Azerbaijan Airlines, Azul Linhas, Bahamasair, Bangkok Airways, Biman Bangladesh, British Airways, Brussels Airlines, Cambodia Angkor Air, Caribbean Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Cebu Pacific, China Airlines, China Southern, CommutAir, Copa Airlines, Cubana de Aviacion, Czech Airlines, Delta Airlines, Dragonair, EL AL, Ethiopian Airlines, Eurowings, EVA Air, Fiji Airways, Finnair, Flair Air, Garuda Indonesia, Gol Linhas Aereas, Hainan Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, Hong Kong Airlines, Iberia, Interjet, Iran Air, Iran Aseman Air, Japan Airlines, Jet2, jetBlue Airways, Jetstar Airways, Jetstar Asia, Korean Air, Kulula, Kuwait Air, LOT Polish, Lufthansa, Mahan Air, Malaysia Airlines, Mango, Mesa Airlines, Middle East Airlines, Monarch Airlines, Norwegian, Onur Air, Peach, Philippine Airlines, Porter Airlines, Qantas Airways, Republic Airways, Royal Air Morocco, SAS Scandinavian, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, SilkAir, Silver Airways, Singapore Airlines, Skywest, Inc., South African Airways, SpiceJet, Spirit Airlines, SriLankan Airlines, Swiss Int'l Air Lines, TAAG Angola, TAM Airlines, Thai Airways, Trans States, Travel Service Airlines, Turkish Airlines, United Airlines, Ural Airlines, Uzbekistan Air, Vietnam Airlines, Virgin Atlantic, WOW Airlines.
When considering a carry on backpack, both the Osprey Porter 46 and the Exped Transit 40 hold strong standing. The Osprey Porter, as the name suggests, offers a hefty 46 liters of storage capacity, housed within a nylon shell. Carrying a heavier weight of 1.5 pounds, it could surely meet the needs of a traveler looking for room to pack. However, one vital point to note is it's compatibility with airlines, sitting at just 47%.
On the other hand, the Exped Transit 40 weighs lighter at just 0.8 pounds. It trades off 6 liters of capacity compared to the Porter 46, but shines in compatibility, being acceptable on 91% of airlines. This backpack showcases an exquisite 840 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water column Oeko-Tex 100 certified. A rather important feature to note is its lack of laptop compartment.
The differences between the two backpacks can be summarized as follows:
- Size and Weight: The Osprey Porter 46 is larger but heavier than the Exped Transit 40. For travelers who prioritize lightweight portability, the Exped Transit 40 wins the round.
- Capacity: Despite its lighter weight, the Exped Transit 40 offers less storage at 40 liters vs the Osprey Porter 46's 46 liters.
- Airlines Compatibility: The Exped Transit 40 is more airline-friendly, with its 91% compatibility dwarfing the Osprey Porter 46's 47%.
- Fabric: Both bags use nylon, but the Exped Transit 40 features its impressive 840 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water column Oeko-Tex 100 certified.
- Laptop Compartment: The Osprey Porter 46 has a laptop compartment, fitting up to a 1" device, while the Exped Transit 40 lacks this feature.
Given this comparison, the choice between the Osprey Porter 46 and the Exped Transit 40 would depend heavily on the specific needs and preferences of the traveler. The Porter 46 appears to cater more to the rugged adventurer who needs substantial packing space and doesn't mind a little extra weight. Meanwhile, the Exped Transit 40 seems better suited for the light, frequent flyer who values a sleek, compact design over extra compartments. However, both of these bags were clearly created with thoughtful design and useful features, making them serious contenders in the carry-on backpack world.