Osprey Porter 46 vs. Lo & Sons Hanover 2
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Lo & Sons Hanover 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| top | Passport | Y |
| Y | Passthrough | Y |
| Carry | ||
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 16in | Laptop | 13in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR | 600D Recycled Poly |
Lo & Sons Hanover 2
| Capacity | 21.4 L |
| Weight | 0.8 kg |
| Dimensions | 42×30×18 cm |
| Airline fit | 95% |
| Price | $238 |
Key differences between the Osprey Porter 46 and Lo & Sons Hanover 2
- Compression straps: 2 on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2.
- Opening: Clamshell on the Osprey Porter 46; Top zip on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2.
- Passport pocket: Top on the Osprey Porter 46; Yes on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2.
- Backpack straps: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; Yes on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2.
- Hip belt: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2.
- Sternum strap: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2.
- Laptop sleeve: 16in on the Osprey Porter 46; 13in on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2.
- Main compartments: 4 on the Osprey Porter 46; 1 on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2.
Both have: luggage passthrough, built-in organizer, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 116 accept both. 0 accept only the Osprey Porter 46, and 64 accept only the Lo & Sons Hanover 2.
Only the Lo & Sons Hanover 2 fits
Aerolineas Argentinas, Air Baltic, Air China, Air France, Air India, Air Malta, Air Mauritius, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Boliviana de Aviacion, Bulgaria Air, Cayman Airways, China Eastern, Croatia Air, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Etihad Airways, flybe, Gulf Air, Icelandair, Indigo, InselAir, Jet Airways, Juneyao Airlines, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Liat Airlines, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Oman Air, Pakistan International, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Royal Jordanian, Ryanair, S7, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sky Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, Volotea, WestJet, Xiamen.
The Osprey Porter 46 packs a hefty punch when it comes to backpack performance. Standing 23 inches tall and considerably wider and deeper than its counterpart, the Porter 46 caters to the heavy-duty traveler with a capacity of 46 liters. Constructed with durable nylon and compatible with almost half of the airlines, it confidently fits the bill for those who enjoy the roughness of traveling a bit off the beaten path. The Porter 46 also houses a laptop compartment that can accommodate a laptop of up to 15 inches.
Lo & Sons Hanover 2, on the other hand, offers a lighter and sleeker option without skimping on functionality. It is more airline-friendly than the Porter 46, with a slim profile that affords it compatibility with virtually all airlines. The Hanover 2 is also lighter than the Porter 46, weighing a modest 0.8 pounds. However, it has a smaller carrying capacity, only able to contain 21.4 liters. The Hanover 2 features a laptop compartment that can fit a 13-inch laptop.
To summarize, here are the key differences between the two backpacks:
- Size: the Osprey Porter 46 is notably larger, compared to the less bulky Lo & Sons Hanover 2
- Weight: Osprey Porter 46 weighs 1.5 pounds, while the Lo & Sons Hanover 2 weighs just 0.8 pounds
- Capacity: Osprey Porter 46 has a substantial capacity of 46 liters, while the Lo & Sons Hanover 2 can accommodate 21.4 liters
- Material: Osprey Porter 46 is made of Nylon, and Lo & Sons Hanover 2 of 600D Recycled Poly
- Airline compatibility: The Osprey Porter 46 is compatible with 47% of airlines, while the Lo & Sons Hanover 2 boasts of a 99% compatibility
- Laptop compartment: The Osprey Porter 46 can accommodate a larger laptop up to 15 inches, compared to the Lo & Sons Hanover 2 that can fit a 13 inch laptop.
Diving deeper into the user experience, the Porter 46 seems to be hailed for its large packing capacity, solid build and organization. On the other hand, the Hanover 2 is lauded for its sleek, minimalist design yet impressive organization and storage capabilities. It also earns brownie points for its multi-functionality, easily transitioning from a parent bag to a work bag.
In conclusion, both backpacks bring their unique strengths forth, answering to two different types of travelers. The Osprey Porter 46 wins brownie points as a workhorse, great for heavy packers with its larger size, high capacity and sturdy construction. The Lo & Sons Hanover 2, however, shines as a refined, versatile and lightweight backpack perfect considered by many as a commuter’s dream. It's clear - the choice between the two ultimately hinges on the specific needs and preferences of the user.