Osprey Porter 46 vs. DSPTCH Utility Ruck
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | DSPTCH Utility Ruck |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 3 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| H | Hip Belt | N |
| H | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | 410D Nylon Packcloth with DWR coating |
DSPTCH Utility Ruck
| Capacity | 28 L |
| Weight | 1.4 kg |
| Dimensions | 44×31×21 cm |
| Airline fit | 99% |
| Price | $204 |
The Osprey Porter 46 is a substantial backpack that doesn't apologize for its generous size. It's made to be filled up and bears the load well. Reviewers consistently note its versatility and value, praising its thoughtful design that lends itself to the urban traveler's needs. Made of nylon, its strength can't be disputed and it's comfortable to boot. Its laptop compartment can fit up to a one inch laptop – rough and ready just like the rest of this bag.
On the other hand, the DSPTCH Utility Ruck is slightly lighter, though it also comes in somewhat smaller. Its capacity is a more modest 28 liters, although it has been praised for its clever organization. Made from 410D Nylon Packcloth with a DWR coating, it's notably strong and durable. Its compatibility with airlines tops the Porter 46, coming in at a notable 99%. Another standout feature is that its laptop compartment can fit a full 15 inch laptop. This backpack was originally designed as a multi-functional diaper bag, which perhaps contributes to its superb organization.
- Size: Osprey Porter 46 is 23"H x 36"W x 56"D while DSPTCH Utility Ruck is 21"H x 44"W x 31"D
- Weight: Porter is slightly heavier at 1.5 pounds, versus the Ruck at 1.4 pounds
- Capacity: Porter offers a larger capacity of 46 liters; Ruck a more conservative 28 liters
- Airlines compatibility: The Ruck takes this, compatible with 99% of airlines. The Porter is compatible with 47%
- Material: Porter is made of nylon. Ruck is made of 410D Nylon Packcloth with DWR coating
- Laptop compartment: Porter can fit a 1 inch laptop; Ruck accommodates a 15 inch laptop
While both the Porter and the Ruck shine in their own respects, your choice will likely come down to personal requirements and preferences. The Porter can handle a substantial load with ease, and is perhaps the better one if you're looking to pack more onto your back. Its clamshell opening is praised as being, frankly, super convenient. Yet the Ruck clearly stands up in terms of comfort and intuitive organization, not to mention that it's a favorite among airlines. If you need to keep your laptop close at hand, this might be your match. Either way, these backpacks won't disappoint.