Osprey Porter 46 vs. LL Bean Continental
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | LL Bean Continental |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 0 |
| N | Passport | front |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | H |
| H | Hip Belt | N |
| H | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | N |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | 1000-denier Kodra |
LL Bean Continental
| Capacity | 41 L |
| Weight | 1.4 kg |
| Dimensions | 49×34×22 cm |
| Airline fit | 98% |
| Price | $170 |
The Osprey Porter 46 and the LL Bean Continental are both formidable options in the realm of carry-on backpacks. Each offers unique attributes that caters to a different type of traveller.
The Osprey Porter 46, worn on the backs of rugged travelers and city explorers alike, is heralded for its impressive capacity. Weighing in at 1.5 pounds, this backpack gives you 46 liters of storage—5 liters more than its LL Bean counterpart. The Porter is also made of durable nylon fabric. Be it an oversized camera lens or an extra pair of hiking boots, this pack stands ready. However, its size means it falls on the less compatible side, being approved by only 47% of airlines.
On the other hand, the LL Bean Continental comes in just slightly lighter at 1.4 pounds and sports a modest 41 liters of storage. Built with robust 1000-denier Kodra, this bag does not skimp on toughness. Its impressive airline compatibility of 98% makes it a reliable choice for regular flyers. A smaller laptop compartment might be limiting to some.
Here's a quick summary:
- Size: The Porter is larger, 23"x36"x56" vs the Continental's 49"x34"x22"
- Weight: The Porter is slightly heavier at 1.5 pounds compared to the Continental's 1.4 pounds
- Capacity: The Porter offers more storage with 46 liters, compared to the Continental's 41 liters
- Airline Compatibility: The Porter is less versatile, fitting 47% of airlines, compared to the Continental's whopping 98%
- Material: The Porter is made from nylon where as the Continental is composed of 1000-denier Kodra
- Laptop Compartment Size: The Porter can accommodate a larger laptop
In terms of reviewer sentiments, the Osprey 46 Porter has been praised for its capacity, durability, and smart design. Buyers appreciated its good suspension, spacious storage, and convenient clamshell opening. Conversely, although mentioned less frequently, the LL Bean Continental is admired for its robust material and airline compatibility.
It seems the ideal backpack primarily depends on the user's travel style and needs. If volume and rugged design are priorities, the Osprey Porter 46 won't steer you wrong. If frequent air travel and robust material are top of your list, put the LL Bean Continental at the top of your shopping list.