Osprey Porter 46 vs. HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+ |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 2 | Compression | Y |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | removable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | removable |
| Inside | ||
| 16in | Laptop | 15in |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR | 840 D Ballistic Nylon, PU coated 1680 D Ballistic Nylon, PU coated |
HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+
| Capacity | 45 L |
| Weight | 1.9 kg |
| Dimensions | 63×33×29 cm |
| Airline fit | 1% |
| Price | $199 |
Key differences between the Osprey Porter 46 and HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+
- Compression straps: 2 on the Osprey Porter 46; Yes on the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
- Opening: Clamshell on the Osprey Porter 46; Top zip on the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
- Passport pocket: Top on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
- Luggage passthrough: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
- Backpack straps: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; Yes on the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
- Hip belt: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; Removable on the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
- Sternum strap: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; Removable on the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
- Laptop sleeve: 16in on the Osprey Porter 46; 15in on the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
- Main compartments: 4 on the Osprey Porter 46; 1 on the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
- Built-in organizer: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
Both have: water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 2 accept both. 114 accept only the Osprey Porter 46, and 0 accept only the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+.
Only the Osprey Porter 46 fits
Adria Airways, Aegean Airlines, Aer Lingus, Aeroflot, Aeromexico, Air Asia, Air Astana, Air Canada, Air Caraibes, Air Europa, Air Koryo, Air Macau, Air New Zealand, Air Nostrum, Air Tahiti Nui, Air Wisconsin, AirAsiaX, Alaska Airlines, All Nipon Airways, Allegiant Air, American Airlines, ANA, Atlas Global, Austrian, Avianca , Azerbaijan Airlines, Azul Linhas, Bahamasair, Bangkok Airways, Biman Bangladesh, British Airways, Brussels Airlines, Cambodia Angkor Air, Caribbean Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Cebu Pacific, China Airlines, China Southern, CommutAir, Conviasa, Copa Airlines, Cubana de Aviacion, Czech Airlines, Delta Airlines, Dragonair, EL AL, Ethiopian Airlines, Eurowings, EVA Air, Fiji Airways, Finnair, Flair Air, Frontier Airlines, Garuda Indonesia, Gol Linhas Aereas, Hainan Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, Hong Kong Airlines, Iberia, Interjet, Iran Air, Iran Aseman Air, Island Air, Japan Airlines, Jet2, jetBlue Airways, Jetstar Airways, Jetstar Asia, Korean Air, Kulula, Kuwait Air, LOT Polish, Lufthansa, Mahan Air, Malaysia Airlines, Mango, Mesa Airlines, Middle East Airlines, Monarch Airlines, Norwegian, Onur Air, Peach, PenAir, Philippine Airlines, Porter Airlines, Qantas Airways, Republic Airways, Royal Air Morocco, SAS Scandinavian, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, SilkAir, Silver Airways, Singapore Airlines, Skywest, Inc., South African Airways, Southwest Airlines, SpiceJet, Spirit Airlines, SriLankan Airlines, Sun Country, Swiss Int'l Air Lines, TAAG Angola, TAM Airlines, Thai Airways, Trans States, Travel Service Airlines, Turkish Airlines, United Airlines, Ural Airlines, Uzbekistan Air, Vietnam Airlines, Virgin Atlantic, WOW Airlines.
The Osprey Porter 46 and the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+ come from reputable manufacturers with a solid following in the travel community. Both are desirable for their generous capacity and lightweight construction, with the Porter 46 weighing just 1.5 pounds and the Monolith 45+ tipping the scale at 1.9 pounds. Yet, they offer slightly different features and specifications that might sway travelers one way or another.
In keeping with the no-nonsense ethos of its maker, the Osprey Porter 46 is a beast of burden with a sternum strap, straightforward design, and a towering 46-liter capacity. Its dimensions make it a friendlier pack for air travel, compatible with 47% of airlines. It boasts a durable nylon construction and a laptop compartment that can house a 1 inch laptop. Critics praise it for its ample space, durability, versatility, and thoughtful design, frequently referring to it as the "backpack of your dreams." The Porter's clamshell opening, compression strap, and suspension also earn wide acclaim.
On the other hand:
- The HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+ is taller, narrower, and deeper—but slightly less roomy, with a 45-liter capacity.
- Weighing 1.9 pounds, it’s a bit heavier than the Osprey Porter 46.
- It only works with 18% of airlines.
- The exterior is made from 840 D Ballistic Nylon, PU coated 1680 D Ballistic Nylon, PU coated, enveloping an interior with a 15-inch laptop compartment.
- This rucksack enjoys positive reviews for its comfort, solid craftsmanship, and multipurpose attachment points.
- The side-access laptop sleeve with a protective false bottom is an outstanding feature.
Despite its less favorable airline compatibility, the Monolith Rucksack 45+ stands out for rugged adventure-seekers. Heimplanet engineered this bag to handle the backcountry's rigors, utilizing ballistic nylon construction meant for challenging outdoor use. The rucksack also receives praise for its comfortable padding and harness system, keeping travelers comfy during their sojourn.
In conclusion, the Osprey Porter 46 and the HEIMPLANET Monolith Rucksack 45+ serve two crowds: the light traveler prioritizing space and airline compatibility who would lean towards the former, and the rugged adventurer valuing rugged durability and design innovation who would appreciate the latter. One can't go wrong with either option—it all boils down to individual needs and preferences.