Osprey Porter 46 vs. Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 70L
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 70L |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 0 |
| N | Passport | |
| N | Passthrough | |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | R |
| H | Hip Belt | N |
| H | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | 900-denier 100% postconsumer recycled polyester ripstop, 200-denier 100% recycled polyester |
Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 70L
| Capacity | 70 L |
| Weight | 1.44 kg |
| Dimensions | 72×45×34 cm |
| Airline fit | 18% |
| Price | $158 |
When it comes to carry-on backpacks, none stand out quite as much as the Osprey Porter 46 and the Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 70L. Both packs cater to outdoor enthusiasts and regular travelers alike, but each shines in its own distinct way. The Osprey Porter is compact and sturdy, while the Patagonia duffel bag boasts an impressive volume and tough recycled polyester exterior.
The Osprey Porter 46, with its height of 23 inches, width of 36 inches, and depth of 56 inches, weighs in at 1.5 pounds. Despite its compact dimensions, it boasts a sizable 46-liter capacity. One particularly useful feature is its laptop compartment that can fit a 1-inch thick laptop. This bag's compatibility with 47% of airlines makes it an excellent travel companion, while its nylon construction guarantees its resilience to wear and tear.
Here's a brief comparison of the two:
- Size: Osprey Porter 46 is smaller (23"x36"x56") than Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 70L (34"x45"x72").
- Weight: The Porter 46 weighs slightly more (1.5 lbs) than the Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 70L (1.44 lbs).
- Capacity: Patagonia’s Duffel Bag has a greater capacity (70L) compared to Porter 46 (46L).
- Airline compatibility: Porter 46 is compatible with 47% of airlines, much more than the 18% compatibility of Patagonia’s bag.
- Material: Porter 46 is made of Nylon, while Patagonia’s bag is crafted from 100% postconsumer recycled polyester ripstop, and 200-denier 100% recycled polyester.
Making a larger statement with its 34 inches height, 45 inches width, and 72 inches depth, the Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 70L manages to outweigh its competitor by a mere 0.06 pounds. However, this larger pack captures a truly spacious 70-liter capacity. What stands out about this particular bag is that it's made entirely from 900-denier 100% postconsumer recycled polyester ripstop and 200-denier 100% recycled polyester. Despite being compatible with only 18% of airlines, the bag's eco-friendly construction and spaciousness might make it the preferred choice for some globetrotters.
At the end of the day, both the Osprey Porter 46 and the Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 70L have proven their worth among travel gear enthusiasts. If you prefer a smaller, lightweight backpack that is airline-friendly, with a substantial storage capacity, the Porter 46 is your match. However, if an environmentally conscious pack that sacrifices a bit of portability for additional storage space appeals to you more, the Patagonia duffel bag hits the mark. Both packs offer undeniable durability, versatility, and convenience, packing a punch in their distinctive way.