Osprey Porter 46 vs. Jansport Field Pack
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Jansport Field Pack |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 4 |
| N | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| H | Hip Belt | N |
| H | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | |
Jansport Field Pack
| Capacity | 28 L |
| Weight | 0.56 kg |
| Dimensions | 43×31×13 cm |
| Airline fit | 84% |
| Price | $55 |
The Osprey Porter 46 and the Jansport Field Pack are two noteworthy backpacks that travelers frequently compare. Both backpacks are distinctive in dimension, weight, and utility, and their differences are distinct enough to make them cater to divergent user preferences. The Osprey Porter 46, with dimensions of 23"x36"x56" and a weight of 1.5 pounds, is a definitive behemoth of a carry pack. It boasts a capacity of 46 liters, the perfect backpack option if you err towards carrying the kitchen sink when you travel. Reviewers are consistent in their praise, mentioning that it is a durable, gear-hauling wonder that offers superior value for its price.
On the other hand, the Jansport Field Pack keeps it compact and incredibly light. At 13"x31"x43" and a mere 0.56 pounds in weight, it offers 28 liters of packing space, enough for most day-to-day needs of the urban traveler. Despite its smaller size, it offers ample organization pockets and comes with an alluring lifetime warranty that propels it higher in the value-for-money reckoning.
Here are a few comparison points:
- Size: Osprey Porter 46 is larger, while Jansport Field Pack is more compact.
- Weight: Osprey Porter 46 weighs 1.5 lbs, and Jansport Field Pack is a lightweight 0.56 lbs.
- Capacity: Osprey Porter 46 packs in 46 liters, compared to the Jansport Field Pack's 28 liters.
- Airline Compatibility: Jansport Field Pack takes the cake here, with 84% compatibility, outnumbering Osprey Porter 46's 47%.
- Materials Used: Osprey Porter 46 is made of Nylon, while Jansport Field Pack didn't specify the material used.
- Laptop Compartment: Osprey Porter 46 fits a 1-inch laptop, while Jansport Field Pack fits a 15-inch laptop.
- Why to Buy: Osprey Porter 46 offers excellent suspension and space along with a neat look, while Jansport Field Pack excels in pocket options, organization, and comes with a lifetime warranty.
Whether you're eyeing the Osprey Porter 46 for its massive space and robustness or the Jansport Field Park for its lightweight construction, attractive lifetime warranty, and multiple pocket options, you're in for a solid companion. Assess your needs and pick one that resonates with your carry-on preferences. Either way, you can't lose.