Osprey Porter 46 vs. Totepack No. 2
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Totepack No. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 2 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| top | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 16in | Laptop | |
| 4 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | |
| Y | Water Resistant | |
| Material | |
| bluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR | G-1000 HeavyDuty Eco |
Key differences between the Osprey Porter 46 and Totepack No. 2
- Compression straps: 2 on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Totepack No. 2.
- Opening: Clamshell on the Osprey Porter 46; Top zip on the Totepack No. 2.
- Passport pocket: Top on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Totepack No. 2.
- Luggage passthrough: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Totepack No. 2.
- Backpack straps: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; Yes on the Totepack No. 2.
- Hip belt: Hideable on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Totepack No. 2.
- Sternum strap: Yes on the Osprey Porter 46; No on the Totepack No. 2.
- Main compartments: 4 on the Osprey Porter 46; 1 on the Totepack No. 2.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 116 accept both. 0 accept only the Osprey Porter 46, and 63 accept only the Totepack No. 2.
Only the Totepack No. 2 fits
Aerolineas Argentinas, Air Baltic, Air China, Air France, Air India, Air Malta, Air Mauritius, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Boliviana de Aviacion, Bulgaria Air, Cayman Airways, China Eastern, Croatia Air, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Etihad Airways, flybe, Gulf Air, Icelandair, Indigo, InselAir, Jet Airways, Juneyao Airlines, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Liat Airlines, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Oman Air, Pakistan International, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Royal Jordanian, Ryanair, S7, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sky Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, Volotea, WestJet, Xiamen.
When two titans of the backpack world square off, you can expect a hard-fought match. For frequent air commuters and everyday carry lovers, Osprey's Porter 46 and Fjallraven's Totepack No. 2 present an interesting quandary. On one hand, you have the size and adaptability of the Porter. We're talking about a backpack that can swallow a whopping 46 liters of your gear, with a robust suspension that handles it all without sagging. The canvas-like Nylon even gives it that classic rucksack look that will keep you smiling on every adventure you take it.
Flip the coin though, and you’ll find the Totepack, a model of Scandinavian minimalism paired with durability. The bag’s G-1000 HeavyDuty Eco material and a slim, 16-liter profile make it unbeatable if you're after something lightweight and compact. The convertible straps offer multiple carry options, so whether you're roaming the city streets or rushing through crowded airports, it'll always feel like a perfect fit.
Summary of Differences:
- Osprey Porter is larger with a 46 liter capacity, while the Totepack has a 16 liter capacity.
- The Porter weighs twice as much as the Totepack.
- The Porter is compatible with fewer airlines (47%) compared to the Totepack (83%).
- The Porter is made of Nylon, while the Totepack is made of G-1000 HeavyDuty Eco.
- The Porter has a laptop compartment that fits a 1 inch laptop, whereas the Totepack does not have a laptop compartment.
As our reviewers have mentioned, the crux of the matter when choosing between these bags is all about your packing preferences and flight compatibility. Yes, the Porter is an "excellent value" with "smart features", but it's the Totepack that is more likely to slide under the seat in front of you on a wider range of airlines. That said, if you tend vouch for the packed to the gills philosophy, lending an ear to the praises sung of the Porter's "big capacity" may be worthwhile.
In closing, both of these backpacks are strong contenders in the carry-on category, and each offers unique benefits based on individual traveller needs and preferences. Whether you're a minimalist packer, a gadget geek, or a survivalist, the choice between Osprey's Porter 46 and Fjallraven's Totepack No. 2 will become clear once you've weighed all the factors carefully. Whichever you choose, just remember, the journey is half the fun. Suit up and happy travels!