Osprey Porter 46 vs. Totepack No. 2

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Osprey Porter 46

Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46
Capacity46 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions56×36×23 cm
Airline fit47%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Osprey Porter 46Feature Totepack No. 2
Storage
S Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
H Backpack S
H Hip Belt N
H Sternum Strap N
Inside
1 Laptop
3 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly
0 Water Bottle Holder
Y Water Resistant
Material
NylonG-1000 HeavyDuty Eco

Totepack No. 2

Front facing view of the  Totepack No. 2
Capacity16 L
Weight0.75 kg
Dimensions42×33×12 cm
Airline fit83%

When two titans of the backpack world square off, you can expect a hard-fought match. For frequent air commuters and everyday carry lovers, Osprey's Porter 46 and Fjallraven's Totepack No. 2 present an interesting quandary. On one hand, you have the size and adaptability of the Porter. We're talking about a backpack that can swallow a whopping 46 liters of your gear, with a robust suspension that handles it all without sagging. The canvas-like Nylon even gives it that classic rucksack look that will keep you smiling on every adventure you take it.

Flip the coin though, and you’ll find the Totepack, a model of Scandinavian minimalism paired with durability. The bag’s G-1000 HeavyDuty Eco material and a slim, 16-liter profile make it unbeatable if you're after something lightweight and compact. The convertible straps offer multiple carry options, so whether you're roaming the city streets or rushing through crowded airports, it'll always feel like a perfect fit.

Summary of Differences:

As our reviewers have mentioned, the crux of the matter when choosing between these bags is all about your packing preferences and flight compatibility. Yes, the Porter is an "excellent value" with "smart features", but it's the Totepack that is more likely to slide under the seat in front of you on a wider range of airlines. That said, if you tend vouch for the packed to the gills philosophy, lending an ear to the praises sung of the Porter's "big capacity" may be worthwhile.

In closing, both of these backpacks are strong contenders in the carry-on category, and each offers unique benefits based on individual traveller needs and preferences. Whether you're a minimalist packer, a gadget geek, or a survivalist, the choice between Osprey's Porter 46 and Fjallraven's Totepack No. 2 will become clear once you've weighed all the factors carefully. Whichever you choose, just remember, the journey is half the fun. Suit up and happy travels!