Osprey Porter 46 vs. Ortlieb Velocity
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Feature by feature
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Ortlieb Velocity |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 2 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| H | Hip Belt | R |
| H | Sternum Strap | R |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | PD620, PS620C |
Ortlieb Velocity
| Capacity | 23 L |
| Weight | 0.88 kg |
| Dimensions | 50×30×16 cm |
| Airline fit | 82% |
| Price | $135 |
When it comes to carry-on backpacks, making the right decision often rests on what one values most: size, weight, capacity, airline compatibility, material, or other special features. Taking a closer look at the Osprey Porter 46 by Osprey and the Ortlieb Velocity by Ortlieb will undoubtedly help outline these nuances better.
The Osprey Porter 46 stands tall at 23 inches, with a 36 inches width and 56 inches depth, making it a reasonably large backpack. Made from Nylon, its durability is evident. With a capacity of 46 liters and a snug laptop compartment for a 15.7 inch laptop, it's a rather big pack for those inclined to carry more. Its compatibility with 47% of airlines is a bit of a low, especially for the frequent flyer.
On the other hand, the Ortlieb Velocity sits at 16 inches tall, 30 inches wide, and 50 inches deep. It's lighter compared to the Osprey Porter 46 at 0.88 pounds yet offers only 23 liters of capacity. But, it fits a 15 inch laptop snugly in its laptop compartment and is compatible with 82% of airlines thanks to its compact size. The Velocity's make of PD620 and PS620C promises weatherproof and durability, suited for harsh conditions.
Key Differences:
- Size: Porter 46 is larger than the Velocity (23" x 36" x 56" vs. 16" x 30" x 50")
- Weight: Porter 46 weighs more than the Velocity (1.5lbs vs 0.88lbs)
- Capacity: Significant difference in carrying capacity (46 liters vs. 23 liters)
- Compatibility: Velocity is more airline-friendly
- Material: Porter 46 made of nylon, Velocity from weather-resistant PD620, PS620C
- Additional features: Both have laptop compartments (Porter a bit larger)
Reviewer comments offer valuable insights into the pros and cons of each pack. The Porter 46 is seen as spacious and robust, offering great value for money and several smart features. However, there's a consensus that it may be a bit bulky. On the contrary, the Velocity's lightweight and weatherproof design, as well as a sleek look, make it a favorite amongst travelers – especially since its compatibility with most airlines gives it a leg-up.
Consider the benefits and downsides to both based on the intended use. For bulky items or longer trips, the Porter 46 may be a smarter choice. However, for compactness, lightness, and airline compatibility, the Velocity captures attention. Knowing these points of comparison, the choice for the perfect carry-on backpack becomes decidedly less daunting.