Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
| Osprey Porter 46 | Feature | Trakke Stor |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 1 |
| N | Passport | front |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | H |
| H | Hip Belt | N |
| H | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 1 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| Nylon | Waxed canvas |
The Osprey Porter 46 and the Trakke Stor are two admirable choices when it comes to carry-on backpacks, but they offer up varied features which reflect their unique design philosophies. At first glance, the most noticeable difference relates to their dimensions and weight. Osprey's Porter 46 stands taller and wider at 23 inches by 36 inches, although it bears more depth at 56 inches compared to Trakke Stor's 49 by 34 by 19 inches. The Porter 46 comes weighing slightly heavier at 1.5 pounds against Trakke Stor's 1.4 pounds.
Here's a quick bullet point comparison:
While these two backpacks walk different paths in size and material, they share a common ground in positive customer feedback. Impressively, a reviewer described the Porter 46 as ‘a durable option for those who tend to carry more’. Further testimony highlights its impressive gear capacity and solid construction that makes it a good value for urban travelers. Meanwhile, the Trakke Stor earns praise for its simple, eye-catching style, quality materials, and versatility.
Both the Porter 46 and the Trakke Stor carry their weight in pros. The Porter 46 offers good suspension, roomy capacity, a convenient clamshell opening and compression strap to maintain a tidy appearance, and is quite light given its dimensions. The Trakke Stor, shines with a stylish design aesthetic using quality materials in an expertly crafted package with admirable water resistance.