---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/q5ji75yftc/arcteryx-granville-20/s99nxeegcl/fjallraven-travel-pack-small/"
title: "Arc&#39;Teryx Granville 20 vs Fjallraven Travel Pack Small"
description: "Arc&#39;Teryx Granville 20 vs Fjallraven Travel Pack Small: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/q5ji75yftc/arcteryx-granville-20/s99nxeegcl/fjallraven-travel-pack-small/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Arc'Teryx Granville 20 vs. Fjallraven Travel Pack Small

# Arc'Teryx Granville 20 vs. Fjallraven Travel Pack Small

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Arc'Teryx Granville 20](https://onebag.travel/carryon/q5ji75yftc/arcteryx-granville-20/)

by [Arc'teryx](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Arc'teryx)

![Front facing view of the Arc'Teryx Granville 20](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1620622969/carryons/Arc_Teryx_Granville_20_ziumyv.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>20 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>52×32×18 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>88%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$180</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Arc'Teryx Granville 20 | Feature | Fjallraven Travel Pack Small |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 3 | Opening | 1 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 1 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer |  |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>N400r-AC² nylon 6 ripstop</td><td>G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Fjallraven Travel Pack Small](https://onebag.travel/carryon/s99nxeegcl/fjallraven-travel-pack-small/)

by [Fjallraven](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Fjallraven)

![Front facing view of the Fjallraven Travel Pack Small](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1624439291/carryons/Fjallraven_Travel_Pack_Small_apqgix.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>20 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.35 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>40×29×17 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>98%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$195</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Arc'Teryx Granville 20 and Fjallraven Travel Pack Small

-   **Opening:** Top flap on the Arc'Teryx Granville 20; Clamshell on the Fjallraven Travel Pack Small.
-   **Sternum strap:** Yes on the Arc'Teryx Granville 20; No on the Fjallraven Travel Pack Small.

Both have: backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 167 accept both. 0 accept only the Arc'Teryx Granville 20, and 19 accept only the Fjallraven Travel Pack Small.

### Only the Fjallraven Travel Pack Small fits

Air Niugini, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Spring Airlines, Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.

## Arc'Teryx Granville 20 vs. Fjallraven Travel Pack Small: which should you pack?

The **Arc'Teryx Granville 20** carries the same capacity as the **Fjallraven Travel Pack Small** (20L vs. 20L), while the **Arc'Teryx Granville 20** is the lighter pack at 1.3kg (vs. 1.35kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Fjallraven Travel Pack Small** fits 98% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arc'Teryx Granville 20; if you want to travel lighter, the Arc'Teryx Granville 20 is the better call.
