---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/okohae03di/cotopaxi-nazca-24l/ua8pihdzzj/timbuk2-command/"
title: "Cotopaxi Nazca 24L (discontinued) vs Timbuk2 Command"
description: "Cotopaxi Nazca 24L (discontinued) vs Timbuk2 Command: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/okohae03di/cotopaxi-nazca-24l/ua8pihdzzj/timbuk2-command/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cotopaxi Nazca 24L vs. Timbuk2 Command

# Cotopaxi Nazca 24L vs. Timbuk2 Command

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cotopaxi Nazca 24L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/okohae03di/cotopaxi-nazca-24l/)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/btzropojpfaic1vbeiuu)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>24 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.1 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>51×27×14 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>90%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$140</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cotopaxi Nazca 24L | Feature | Timbuk2 Command |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
|  | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 0 | Opening | 0 |
| top | Passport | top |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
|  | Backpack |  |
|  | Hip Belt | N |
|  | Sternum Strap | removable |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 5 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
|  | Water Bottle Holder |  |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>cotton/polyester canvas shell</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Timbuk2 Command](https://onebag.travel/carryon/ua8pihdzzj/timbuk2-command/)

by [Timbuk2](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Timbuk2)

![Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Command](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601602126/carryons/timbukcommand_lx91mz.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>32 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.1 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>49×34×14 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>91%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$130</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L and Timbuk2 Command

-   **Main compartments:** 3 on the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L; 5 on the Timbuk2 Command.
-   **Built-in organizer:** No on the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L; Yes on the Timbuk2 Command.

Both have: passport pocket, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 169 accept both. 1 accept only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L, and 3 accept only the Timbuk2 Command.

### Only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

### Only the Timbuk2 Command fits

Belavia, Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways.

## Cotopaxi Nazca 24L vs. Timbuk2 Command: which should you pack?

The **Timbuk2 Command** carries 8L more than the **Cotopaxi Nazca 24L** (24L vs. 32L), while the **Cotopaxi Nazca 24L** is the lighter pack at 1.1kg (vs. 1.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Timbuk2 Command** fits 91% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Timbuk2 Command; if you want to travel lighter, the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L is the better call.