---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/ogieeemqgz/greenroom136-rainmaker/y7i0o037bp/fjallraven-travel-pack/"
title: "Greenroom136 Rainmaker versus Fjallraven Travel Pack - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Fjallraven Travel Pack carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/ogieeemqgz/greenroom136-rainmaker/y7i0o037bp/fjallraven-travel-pack/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Fjallraven Travel Pack

# Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Fjallraven Travel Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Greenroom136 Rainmaker](https://onebag.travel/carryon/ogieeemqgz/greenroom136-rainmaker/)

by [Greenroom](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Greenroom)

![Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601080113/carryons/rainmaker_s6wwzu.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>22 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.7 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>40×28×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>99%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$150</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Fjallraven Travel Pack |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 4 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| side | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | hideable |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 2 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>1000D Cordura</td><td>G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Fjallraven Travel Pack](https://onebag.travel/carryon/y7i0o037bp/fjallraven-travel-pack/)

by [Fjallraven](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Fjallraven)

![Front facing view of the Fjallraven Travel Pack](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1625462125/carryons/Fjallraven_Travel_Pack_ccmaen.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.65 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>46×32×27 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$225</td></tr></tbody></table>

When it comes to carry-on backpacks, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Fjallraven Travel Pack certainly grab the attention of travelers. The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is our first contender, standing 40 inches tall, 28 inches wide and 21 inches deep, it offers 22 liters of packing space. This backpack maintains a firm form with its 1000D Cordura make, protecting your goods from inevitable jostling. Weighing in at a mere 1.7 pounds, its lightweight character doesn't compromise its sturdiness. A prime feature of the Rainmaker is the laptop compartment that can accommodate a 15-inch laptop. Despite its smaller capacity, the Rainmaker efficiently organizes your belongings, giving you easy access when you need it.

In the other corner, we have the Fjallraven Travel Pack. Its slightly larger dimensions (27 inches tall, 32 inches wide, and 46 inches deep) make for a generous packing capacity of 35 liters. Despite this spacious interior, the backpack only weighs 1.65 pounds. Unique to the Fjallraven line, the Travel Pack is crafted from G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco fabric, a blend of durable polyester and cotton. Interestingly, the Travel Pack equals the Rainmaker in terms of technology accommodation, hosting a 15-inch laptop in a designated compartment.

Key differences between the two include:

-   **Size and Capacity**: Greenroom136 Rainmaker is taller but slim, with a 22-liter capacity, while the Fjallraven Travel Pack has a depth advantage and 35-liter capacity.
-   **Weight**: Both backpacks are lightweight, yet the Fjallraven Travel Pack is slightly lighter (1.65 pounds) than the Greenroom136 Rainmaker (1.7 pounds).
-   **Material**: The Rainmaker uses 1000D Cordura, whereas the Travel Pack opts for a mix of polyester and cotton under the name G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco.
-   **Airline Compatibility**: The Rainmaker boasts 100% compatibility while the Fjallraven Travel Pack is restricted to 30% compatibility.
-   **Aesthetics and Reviews**: The Rainmaker is praised for its function-focused design and customizability options, while the Fjallraven Travel Pack scores points for its sleek Scandinavian design and heightened organization.

Let's dive into what makes the Greenroom136 Rainmaker a viable choice besides its dimensions and features. Reviewers attest to its solid craftsmanship, reliability and customizability options. Its water-resistant exterior ensures protection of your belongings in unpredictable weather. The internal organization of the bag further ensures a neat arrangement to keep your belongings intact. On the flip side, what makes the Fjallraven Travel Pack stand out is its relative comfort, classical aesthetics, and functional pockets. Despite its larger appearance, it can surprisingly fit more items than it appears to. It exhibits finesse in organization, allowing you to arrange your belongings in an orderly fashion.

Both these backpacks stand their ground, each with their distinct dynamics and utilities. The Greenroom136 Rainmaker acts as a lightweight, sturdy, and versatile option. On the other hand, the Fjallraven Travel pack pulls users with its spacious compartments and functional design. So the choice boils down to your personal needs and preferences, whether it's the Rainmaker's efficient use of space and full airline compatibility or the Travel Pack's considerable capacity and sleek design.