---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/ogieeemqgz/greenroom136-rainmaker/o7l1xo846d/ryu-locker-24l/"
title: "Greenroom136 Rainmaker versus RYU Locker 24L - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and RYU Locker 24L carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/ogieeemqgz/greenroom136-rainmaker/o7l1xo846d/ryu-locker-24l/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. RYU Locker 24L

# Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. RYU Locker 24L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Greenroom136 Rainmaker](https://onebag.travel/carryon/ogieeemqgz/greenroom136-rainmaker/)

by [Greenroom](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Greenroom)

![Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601080113/carryons/rainmaker_s6wwzu.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>22 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.7 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>40×28×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>99%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$150</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | RYU Locker 24L |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 4 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| side | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | removable |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 4 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | ✓ |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>1000D Cordura</td><td>630D Nylon with Polyurethane coating</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [RYU Locker 24L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/o7l1xo846d/ryu-locker-24l/)

by [RYU](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=RYU)

![Front facing view of the RYU Locker 24L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601083566/carryons/lockerpack_nuj9kt.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>24 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×30×29 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$190</td></tr></tbody></table>

The **Greenroom136 Rainmaker** and the **RYU Locker 24L** are two standout carry-on backpacks currently vying for the attention of the frequent traveler. Each model has distinct attributes worth noting. The Rainmaker's 1000D Cordura exterior suggests a ruggedness primed for the rigors of regular travel. On the other hand, the Locker's 630D Nylon with Polyurethane coating hints at an emphasis on lightweight durability.

Here's a breakdown of their differing specifications:

-   Dimensions: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (40x28x21 inches) vs RYU Locker 24L (56x29x30 inches)
-   Weight: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (1.7 pounds) vs RYU Locker 24L (0 pounds)
-   Capacity: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (22L) vs RYU Locker 24L (24L)
-   Airline Compatibility: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (100%) vs RYU Locker 24L (89%)
-   Material: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (1000D Cordura) vs RYU Locker 24L (630D Nylon with Polyurethane coating)
-   Laptop Compartment: Both models can fit a 15-inch laptop

Reviewers gush over both backpacks, lauding the Rainmaker's value and customizability, while praising the Locker's functionality and innovative design. The Rainmaker seems to be the go-to choice for those seeking versatility and water-resistant sturdiness, while the RYU Locker 24L seems to attract those desiring sleekness, premium feel and convenient access to the laptop compartment.

In conclusion, both backpacks offer superb organization and design, with the Greenroom136 Rainmaker project reliability through a sturdy, customizable build, and the RYU Locker 24L leaning more towards a minimalist aesthetic coupled with efficiency. While the ideal choice largely depends on individual needs and aesthetic preferences, these two backpacks prove to be solid options for the conscientious traveler aware of quality and function.