---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/ogieeemqgz/greenroom136-rainmaker/f760ulwiyd/arcteryx-mantis-32-backpack/"
title: "Greenroom136 Rainmaker versus Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/ogieeemqgz/greenroom136-rainmaker/f760ulwiyd/arcteryx-mantis-32-backpack/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack

# Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Greenroom136 Rainmaker](https://onebag.travel/carryon/ogieeemqgz/greenroom136-rainmaker/)

by [Greenroom](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Greenroom)

![Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601080113/carryons/rainmaker_s6wwzu.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>22 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.7 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>40×28×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>99%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$150</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 4 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| side | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | removable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | N |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>1000D Cordura</td><td>420d HD nylon plain weave</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack](https://onebag.travel/carryon/f760ulwiyd/arcteryx-mantis-32-backpack/)

by [Arc'teryx](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Arc'teryx)

![Front facing view of the Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1620621797/carryons/Arc_Teryx_Mantis_Backpack_g8hjt3.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>32 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>53×32×30 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$120</td></tr></tbody></table>

The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is the embodiment of function over form. It stands tall at 40 inches and weighs a comfortable 1.7 pounds. Durability is its game, with the exterior made of 1000D Cordura; it's sturdy, water-resistant, and ready to face any challenge you throw at it. Its 22 liters capacity can organize all your necessary items with ease, from a laptop up to 15 inches to your iPad with no worries. Notably, it has guaranteed compatibility with 100% of airlines, ensuring it'll be your reliable travel companion wherever you go. As quoted by a reviewer, its standout quality is the "solid pack that values function" and the "incredible" customizability options.

On the other hand, Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack exercises versatility in a unique way. It's smaller—standing at 30 inches—but wider and deeper, and incredibly lightweight. Crafted from 420d HD nylon plain weave, it offers durability in a feather-light package. With a massive capacity of 32 liters, it opens wider storage possibilities. Despite its size, compatibility with airlines is where it falls short—marking only 30%. Now, it does not have a specified laptop compartment, but its hydration bladder could conveniently double as a laptop sleeve.

Differences at a glance:

-   **Size**: Greenroom136 Rainmaker is taller, while Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack is wider and deeper
-   **Weight**: Greenroom136 Rainmaker weighs 1.7 pounds, while Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack is feather-light at 0 pounds
-   **Material**: Greenroom136 Rainmaker uses 1000D Cordura; Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack uses 420d HD nylon plain weave
-   **Capacity**: Greenroom136 Rainmaker has a 22 liters capacity, whereas Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack boasts 32 liters
-   **Airline Compatibility**: The Greenroom136 Rainmaker wins with a complete 100% compatibility; Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack comes short at 30%
-   **Laptop Compartment**: Greenroom136 Rainmaker has a 15-inch laptop compartment; Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack utilizes the hydration bladder as a laptop sleeve

Choosing between the Rainmaker and the Mantis will ultimately depend on your preferences and necessities. If your priority is organization, complete airline compatibility, and a dedicated laptop compartment, the Rainmaker is an ideal match. The bag is perfect for anyone looking for a "handmade EDC pack," as mentioned by a reviewer.

However, if light travel with larger capacity is your style, the Mantis will serve you well. Also, its inventive use of the hydration bladder as a laptop sleeve adds an interesting touch. Whichever choice you make, know that both of these backpacks offer high value, great durability, and versatility, and will serve you well in your travels and daily activities.