---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/nvxvhyiyq0/ortlieb-atrack-bp/q01ld8pfi6/patagonia-cragsmith-pack-32l/"
title: "Ortlieb Atrack BP vs Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L"
description: "Ortlieb Atrack BP vs Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/nvxvhyiyq0/ortlieb-atrack-bp/q01ld8pfi6/patagonia-cragsmith-pack-32l/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Ortlieb Atrack BP vs. Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L

# Ortlieb Atrack BP vs. Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Ortlieb Atrack BP](https://onebag.travel/carryon/nvxvhyiyq0/ortlieb-atrack-bp/)

by [Ortlieb](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Ortlieb)

![Front facing view of the Ortlieb Atrack BP](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1630938216/carryons/Atrack_BP_c8wk5x.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>25 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×26×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>27%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$250</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Ortlieb Atrack BP | Feature | Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| Y | Compression | Y |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 0 | Opening | 4 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| Y | Hip Belt | Y |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| N | Laptop | N |
| 1 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 2 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>PS21R</td><td>630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% polyester</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/q01ld8pfi6/patagonia-cragsmith-pack-32l/)

by [Patagonia](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Patagonia)

![Front facing view of the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1633531717/carryons/Cragsmith_32_nt3ai7.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>32 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.131 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>63×25×16 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$169</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Ortlieb Atrack BP and Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L

-   **Opening:** Other on the Ortlieb Atrack BP; Top zip on the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L.

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 26 accept both. 25 accept only the Ortlieb Atrack BP, and 0 accept only the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L.

### Only the Ortlieb Atrack BP fits

Aegean Airlines, Air Astana, Air Nostrum, Atlas Global, British Airways, Conviasa, Copa Airlines, EL AL, Finnair, Frontier Airlines, Great Lakes Airlines, Iran Aseman Air, Jet2, Kuwait Air, Middle East Airlines, Monarch Airlines, Onur Air, PenAir, Southwest Airlines, Spirit Airlines, Sun Country, Thai Airways, Travel Service Airlines, Uzbekistan Air, WOW Airlines.

## Ortlieb Atrack BP vs. Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L: which should you pack?

The **Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L** carries 7L more than the **Ortlieb Atrack BP** (25L vs. 32L), while the **Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L** is the lighter pack at 1.131kg (vs. 1.3kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Ortlieb Atrack BP** fits 27% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L is the better call.