---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/zesvom6pxl/incase-eo/"
title: "Cotopaxi Allpa 35L versus Incase EO - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Incase EO carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/zesvom6pxl/incase-eo/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Incase EO

# Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Incase EO

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/)

by [Cotopaxi](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cotopaxi)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/an7zqlk8sro7sdinpykn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×30×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$225</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Incase EO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | 4 |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| front | Passport | top |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon</td><td>300D heathered weave Ecoya® eco-dyed poly.</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Incase EO](https://onebag.travel/carryon/zesvom6pxl/incase-eo/)

by [Incase](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Incase)

![Front facing view of the Incase EO](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601078429/carryons/eotravel_p9lsed.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>24 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.1 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×38×13 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>58%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$200</td></tr></tbody></table>

If you're looking for a sturdy, reliable carry on backpack, both the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Incase EO are worth checking out. These are two popular options that offer durable materials, convenient compartments, and comply with most airlines' carry-on rules. But, as is always the case, there are slight differences that could sway you towards one or the other, depending on your personal wants and needs.

Let's take a closer look at these differences:

-   Size: The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L is 20 inches tall, 30 inches wide, and 51 inches deep while the Incase EO measures 55 inches tall, 39 inches wide, and 13 inches deep.
-   Weight: The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L weighs 1.5 pounds whereas the Incase EO weighs practically nothing.
-   Capacity: The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L has a capacity of 35 liters compared to the Incase EO's 24 liters
-   Material: The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L is made of 1680D ballistic nylon paneling while the Incase EO uses a 300D heathered weave Ecoya® eco-dyed poly.

The reviewer quotes indicate a lot about the quality and functionality of both backpacks. Reviewers praise the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L for its simplicity, comfort, durability, and internal organization. They also love that it comes with extras like a rain cover, collapsible mesh laundry bag, a shoe bag, and a mesh bottle sleeve. It also receives accolades for being a great gift for young travelers.

Meanwhile, the Incase EO is heralded for its well-thought-out pockets and accesses, as well as its expandability and smart internal organization. According to one reviewer, it works well as a one-bag travel pack keeping your things in place.

So, while both the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Incase EO offer great features, the former might be your best bet if you're after more space, extra accessories, and heavier minor weight, while the latter may be a good fit if you're after lightweight and flexibility in size. Ultimately, your choice will depend on your specific travel needs and preferences. Regardless, both prove to be great companions on your journeys.