---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/ybiv5q9f6n/arcteryx-arro-22/"
title: "Cotopaxi Allpa 35L versus Arc'Teryx Arro 22 - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Arc'Teryx Arro 22 carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/ybiv5q9f6n/arcteryx-arro-22/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Arc'Teryx Arro 22

# Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Arc'Teryx Arro 22

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/)

by [Cotopaxi](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cotopaxi)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/an7zqlk8sro7sdinpykn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×30×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$225</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Arc'Teryx Arro 22 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| front | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | Y |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon</td><td>1260-denier Invista Ballistic Superpack nylon</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Arc'Teryx Arro 22](https://onebag.travel/carryon/ybiv5q9f6n/arcteryx-arro-22/)

by [Arc'teryx](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Arc'teryx)

![Front facing view of the Arc'Teryx Arro 22](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1620623019/carryons/Arc_Teryx_Arro_22_norkx8.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>22 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×30×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>39%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$180</td></tr></tbody></table>

If you had to pit the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L against the Arc'Teryx Arro 22 for the title of ultimate carry-on backpack, it'd be quite the contest. Both backpacks tout their features in size, weight, capacity, airline compatibility, materials, and laptop compartments. But what sets them apart lies in the subtleties. We must brush away the trumpets of marketing, and get down to brass tacks - or in this case, ballistic nylons and reviewer quotes.

Let's start with size, in the literal sense of the word. The Allpa 35L weighs a total of 1.5 pounds and provides a roomy 35 liters worth of packing capacity. In comparison, the Arro 22 seems lighter, with its non-existent weight, but offers only 22 liters of space. But where the Allpa boasts of 80% airline compatibility, the Arro only manages to be compatible with 47%. In this aspect, the Allpa might just be more world travel friendly.

Here's a brief breakout comparison:

-   **Size and Weight**: Allpa 35L is 1.5 pounds with 35 liters capacity compared to Arro 22's airy weight and 22 liters capacity.
-   **Compatibility**: Allpa 35L offers 80% airline compatibility, while Arro 22 only manages 47%.
-   **Materials and Laptop Slots**: Both use ballistic nylon and have 15-inch laptop compartment.
-   **Reviewer quotes**: Both the Allpa and Arro receive high marks for durability and usefulness in different environments.

The material both bags boast of is the best in terms of durability. Allpa 35L uses 1680D ballistic nylon paneling in its construction, while Arro 22 is made up of the 1260-denier Invista Ballistic Superpack nylon. Reviewers praise both packs for their durability, and the Arro 22 for its minimalistic aesthetic appeal and comfort.

In sum, the choice between the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Arc'Teryx Arro 22 ultimately boils down to the kind of traveler you are. Are you one who prefers a light pack with a sleek minimalist design or one who needs a heavy-duty pack that's world-travel ready and geared for organization? The traveler decides.