---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/wf9aqulks3/fjallraven-raven-28/"
title: "Cotopaxi Allpa 35L versus Fjallraven Raven 28 - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Fjallraven Raven 28 carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/wf9aqulks3/fjallraven-raven-28/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Fjallraven Raven 28

# Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Fjallraven Raven 28

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/)

by [Cotopaxi](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cotopaxi)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/an7zqlk8sro7sdinpykn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×30×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$225</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Fjallraven Raven 28 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| front | Passport | top |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 4 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | 2, side |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon</td><td>G-1000 HeavyDuty</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Fjallraven Raven 28](https://onebag.travel/carryon/wf9aqulks3/fjallraven-raven-28/)

by [Fjallraven](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Fjallraven)

![Front facing view of the Fjallraven Raven 28](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1624964104/carryons/Fjallraven_Raven_28_ckik6p.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>28 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>47×36×15 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>84%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$120</td></tr></tbody></table>

Whether you're a frequent traveler, a student, or someone who appreciates the convenience of backpacks, the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Fjallraven Raven 28 are two options worth considering. These two backpacks present their own unique features and benefits to the table, though they share a few similarities like their 15 inch laptop compartment.

The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L boasts a hefty 35 liter capacity and is compatible with 80% of airlines. Weighing in at 1.5 pounds, this backpack is made from 1680D ballistic nylon paneling – designed with travel and durability in mind. It comes with a bundle of additional aids like a mesh water bottle sleeve, laundry bag, and shoe bag, just the essentials a modern adventurer requires. In contrast, the Fjallraven Raven 28 possesses a slightly smaller 28 liter capacity. This lightweight bag weighs just under a pound and crafted from G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton. It's not compatible with as many airlines (30%), but offers equally great value for money with its eco-friendly construction and reliable durability.

Here are the main differences between the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Fjallraven Raven 28:

-   **Capacity**: 35L vs. 28L
-   **Weight**: 1.5 pounds vs. 0.965 pounds
-   **Material**: 1680D ballistic nylon paneling vs. G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton
-   **Airline compatibility**: 80% vs. 30%

When it comes to user testimonials, both bags scored high praise from users in various aspects. For the Allpa 35L, users were especially impressed by the bag's intuitive internal organization and durability, making it a favorite among travelers, students, and outdoor enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, Fjallraven Raven 28 users appreciated its everyday practicality and durability, with one reviewer hailing it as the perfect companion for college students.

In conclusion, these bags cater to different needs. If you prioritize capacity and airline compatibility, the Allpa 35L is recommended. However, if your preference lies in sustainability and simple, slim design, the Fjallraven Raven 28 fits the bill. Both offer comfort, durability, and most importantly, protection for your gear, making either bag a worthwhile investment for your backpacking needs.