---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/tex03m0fr5/millican-fraser-the-rucksack-32l/"
title: "Cotopaxi Allpa 35L versus Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/tex03m0fr5/millican-fraser-the-rucksack-32l/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L

# Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/)

by [Cotopaxi](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cotopaxi)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/an7zqlk8sro7sdinpykn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×30×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$225</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 3 |
| front | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | removable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | removable |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 2 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon</td><td>100% recycled polyester (RPET) yarn</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/tex03m0fr5/millican-fraser-the-rucksack-32l/)

by [Millican](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Millican)

![Front facing view of the Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1629976724/carryons/Millican_Fraser_The_Rucksack_32L_g8pwfm.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>32 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×28×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>69%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$236</td></tr></tbody></table>

The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L are two carry-on backpacks to consider if you're on the lookout for a sturdy, well-constructed travel bag. The Allpa 35L, made by outdoor gear brand Cotopaxi, is a sturdy and spacious bag made from 1680D ballistic nylon paneling. On the other hand, Millican's Fraser The Rucksack 32L is crafted from 100% recycled polyester (RPET) yarn, making it a high sustainability choice.

Let's compare the key characteristics:

-   Dimensions: The Allpa 35L is 20" x 30" x 51", while The Rucksack 32L is slightly larger at 23" x 28" x 55".
-   Weight: The Rucksack 32L is lighter at 1.3 pounds while the Allpa 35L weighs 1.5 pounds.
-   Capacity: The Allpa 35L can hold 35 liters, the Rucksack holds slightly less at 32 liters.
-   Airline Compatibility: The Allpa is compatible with 80% of airlines, whereas The Rucksack is compatible with 64%.
-   Material: The Allpa 35L is made of 1680D ballistic nylon paneling, and The Rucksack 32L uses 100% recycled polyester (RPET) yarn.
-   Laptop Compartment: Both have a laptop compartment that can fit a 15-inch laptop.

Reviewers have praised the Allpa 35L for its intuitive internal organization and durability, making it an excellent choice for those seeking simplicity and convenience. The Allpa 35L also includes additional accessories like a rain cover, collapsible mesh laundry bag, nylon shoe bag, and a mesh water bottle sleeve. It's also acclaimed for its comfortable shoulder straps, hip belt, and adjustable sternum straps.

On the other hand, The Rucksack 32L is loved for its classic, timeless aesthetics and high-quality workmanship. Its unique features include a detachable, padded hip belt with its own pockets. Further, it comes with a lifetime warranty - a testament to its long-lasting nature. Reviewers have dubbed it as a versatile bag that impresses with durability and comfortable carry, perfect for both urban commutes and weekend hill treks. In conclusion, both backpacks hold strong advantages, making each a valuable asset depending on your personal preferences and needs.