---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/h1q4o0ts5v/deuter-freerider-28-sl/"
title: "Cotopaxi Allpa 35L versus Deuter Freerider 28 SL - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Deuter Freerider 28 SL carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/h1q4o0ts5v/deuter-freerider-28-sl/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Deuter Freerider 28 SL

# Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Deuter Freerider 28 SL

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/)

by [Cotopaxi](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cotopaxi)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/an7zqlk8sro7sdinpykn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×30×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$225</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Deuter Freerider 28 SL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | Y |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| front | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | Y |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | N |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon</td><td>330D PA 6.6 Ripstop, 210D PA Ripstop</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Deuter Freerider 28 SL](https://onebag.travel/carryon/h1q4o0ts5v/deuter-freerider-28-sl/)

by [Deuter](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Deuter)

![Front facing view of the Deuter Freerider 28 SL](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1621831217/carryons/Deuter_Freerider_28_SL_oz0fsf.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>28 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.98 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>52×34×18 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>88%</td></tr></tbody></table>

The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Deuter Freerider 28 SL are two options for the casual or serious backpacker. The Allpa 35L is a true all-rounder, meeting 80% of airline compatibility standards and coming with a generous capacity of 35 liters. With 1680D ballistic nylon paneling, it's durably made and features a laptop compartment accommodating large 15-inch models. Also, reviews for this backpack highlight how well-suited it is for both urban or outdoorsy travels. Its intuitive internal organization comes highly recommended and it boasts pleasing extras like a collapsible mesh laundry bag, nylon shoe bag, and a mesh water bottle sleeve.

Let's briefly compare these two in bullet points:

-   Size: Cotopaxi Allpa 35L is slightly larger with the dimensions being 20" x 30" x 51", compared to Deuter Freerider 28 SL at 18" x 34" x 52".
-   Weight: The Cotopaxi is heavier at 1.5 pounds, whereas Deuter is lighter at 0.98 pounds.
-   Capacity: Greater capacity in the Cotopaxi Allpa at 35 liters against the Deuter’s 28 liters.
-   Material: Cotopaxi Allpa is made of 1680D ballistic nylon paneling while Deuter Freerider uses 330D PA 6.6 Ripstop and 210D PA Ripstop.
-   Laptop Compatibility: Cotopaxi Allpa accommodates a 15" laptop, whereas the Deuter Freerider does not have a laptop compartment.

Next, the Deuter Freerider 28 SL, while smaller in capacity at 28 liters, is lighter and well-suited to female travelers due to the adjusted SL carry system. Its material construction is a combination of 330D PA 6.6 Ripstop and 210D PA Ripstop which ensures durability. However, it does lack a laptop compartment, which might be a deterrent for those requiring tech storage on their travels. Where it lags in airline compatibility (79%), it makes up for with its well-tailored design appealing specifically to certain body dimensions.

In essence, both backpacks have their unique strengths and cater to specific needs depending on travellers' requirements. If you're looking for more space, laptop storage, and an all-rounder, the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L might serve you better. Alternatively, if weight and a design tailored to a woman's body is a priority, the Deuter Freerider 28 SL could be more suitable.