---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/d6bezomzfw/pakt-travel-backpack/"
title: "Cotopaxi Allpa 35L versus Pakt Travel Backpack - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Pakt Travel Backpack carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/d6bezomzfw/pakt-travel-backpack/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Pakt Travel Backpack

# Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Pakt Travel Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/)

by [Cotopaxi](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cotopaxi)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/an7zqlk8sro7sdinpykn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×30×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$225</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Pakt Travel Backpack |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | 2 |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| front | Passport | front |
| Y | Passthrough | Y |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | hideable |
| hideable | Hip Belt | removable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | removable |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 16in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 5 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | 1, side |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon</td><td>500D recycled nylon</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Pakt Travel Backpack](https://onebag.travel/carryon/d6bezomzfw/pakt-travel-backpack/)

by [Pakt](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Pakt)

![Front facing view of the Pakt Travel Backpack](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1618276605/carryons/Pakt_Travel_Backpack_zei5au.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.9 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×32×21 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>69%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$325</td></tr></tbody></table>

The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Pakt Travel Backpack each pack a solid punch when it comes to functionality and durability. You can't overlook the fact that each has garnered so much publicity and love from real users and reviewers. Let's put these contenders side by side for a clearer understanding of the stakes..

The Allpa comes in strong with its 1680D ballistic nylon paneling which assures you of its durability. It promises to fit right in with 80% of airlines, a notch stronger than the Pakt. The backpack's weight, at a mere 1.5 pounds, makes it a comfort to carry around. It has a good capacity of 35L, fitting it all within its 20 by 30 by 51-inch dimensions. The laptop compartment accommodating a 15 inch laptop crowns its functionality.

On the flip side, we've got the Pakt Travel Backpack. Weighing slightly heavier at 2.04 pounds, it compensates with an eco-friendly 900D rPET exterior. The bag is designed at slightly larger dimensions of 32 by 53 by 17 inches, offering 30 Liters of storage capacity. Like the Allpa, the Pakt also has a 15-inch laptop compartment.

-   **Size**: Cotopaxi (20 by 30 by 51 inches) vs Pakt (32 by 53 by 17 inches)
-   **Weight**: Cotopaxi (1.5 pounds) vs Pakt (2.04 pounds)
-   **Material**: Cotopaxi (1680D ballistic nylon) vs Pakt (900D rPET exterior/ grey 150D polyester interior)
-   **Capacity**: Cotopaxi (35L) vs Pakt (30L)
-   **Laptop Compatibility**: Equal (15 inches)
-   **Airline Compatibility**: Cotopaxi (80%) vs Pakt (79%)

Picking between these two is a tough call and is most likely to be swayed by personal preference. Reviewers of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L have noted the excellent internal organization, calling it "simple, easy, comfortable, and durable." Approval also comes from its compactness - it looks and feels like a regular, everyday carry pack. Whereas, reviewers of the Pakt tagged it as "so damn functional", with credit given to the thoughtful design and impressive flexibility. It manages to accommodate a generous load without getting bloated nor heavy on the back.

Clearly, there is a lot going for each backpack. The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L serves up a comfortable, durable and highly functional backpack for light to heavy-duty travel. Equally compelling, the Pakt Travel Backpack delights users with its eco-conscious materials, thoughtful design, and impressive functionality. Your choice between the two will, therefore, boil down to personal preference. What matters in the end is value for your money.