---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/624zkz52r7/arcido-oxna/"
title: "Cotopaxi Allpa 35L versus Arcido Oxna - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Arcido Oxna carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/624zkz52r7/arcido-oxna/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Arcido Oxna

# Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Arcido Oxna

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/)

by [Cotopaxi](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cotopaxi)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/an7zqlk8sro7sdinpykn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×30×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$225</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Arcido Oxna |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| front | Passport | Y |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | hideable |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | 1 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon</td><td>Kodra Nylon</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Arcido Oxna](https://onebag.travel/carryon/624zkz52r7/arcido-oxna/)

by [Arcido](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Arcido)

![Front facing view of the Arcido Oxna](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1620616787/carryons/Arcido_Oxna_qzy9rw.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>28 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.1 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>50×32×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>91%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$209</td></tr></tbody></table>

Let's dive right into these two backpack heavyweights: the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L by Cotopaxi, and the Arcido Oxna by Arcido. The Allpa 35L is a real powerhouse, coming in with an extra seven liters of capacity over the Oxna's 28 liters. It's made of a hardy 1680D ballistic nylon paneling that's going to stand up to whatever you throw at it (or in it). It's also got some room for your laptop, with a dedicated compartment that can fit up to a 15-inch model. As for that all-important weight factor, the Allpa 35L is a little heavier than the Oxna, with a weight of 1.5 pounds compared to the Oxna's 1.1 pounds.

In terms of dimensions, there isn't much to split the two; the Allpa measures in at 20 inches tall, 30 inches wide, and 51 inches deep, while the Oxna is pretty similar with a depth of 50 inches, a width of 32 inches, and the same height of 20 inches. One area where the Oxna does have an edge, however, is in compatibility with airlines. The Oxna is compatible with 81% of airlines, outdoing the Allpa's 80%.

To summarize the differences between the two:

-   Cotopaxi Allpa 35L has a greater capacity (35 liters vs 28 liters)
-   Arcido Oxna is lighter (1.1 pounds vs 1.5 pounds)
-   The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L is slightly deeper (51 inches vs 50 inches) but more narrow (30 inches vs 32 inches)
-   Arcido Oxna is compatible with slightly more airlines (81% vs 80%)

Digging into the user reviews, both backpacks are well-loved by their users. The Allpa is lauded for its internal organization, intuitive design, and suitability for both urban and outdoor travelers. One reviewer even recommended it as the perfect graduation gift for the budding world traveler. The Oxna, on the other hand, scores points for its minimalist design, mesh front pocket and comfortable padding on the straps. Reviewers applaud the attention to detail and features that travelers would truly appreciate.

So, what's the verdict? Either of these backpacks could be a solid contender for your carry-on needs. The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L shines for its capacity, durable material, and internal organization, making it an excellent choice for those longer trips or if you're the type to pack for every eventuality. On the other side, the Arcido Oxna is built for the minimalist traveler who values lightweight and comfort. Its unique design and airline compatibility edge might be just the thing for routine flyers, digital nomads, or anyone who just prefers to travel light. Like most things, the better choice depends on your needs, style, and how much you want to carry.