---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/4f3kh4o1hc/thule-landmark-40l/"
title: "Cotopaxi Allpa 35L versus Thule Landmark 40L - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Thule Landmark 40L carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/4f3kh4o1hc/thule-landmark-40l/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Thule Landmark 40L

# Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Thule Landmark 40L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/)

by [Cotopaxi](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cotopaxi)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/an7zqlk8sro7sdinpykn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×30×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$225</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Thule Landmark 40L |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | Y |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 0 |
| front | Passport | Y |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | hideable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 1in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | 1 |
| Y | Water Resistant | N |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon</td><td>420D Dobby polyester, 600D polyester</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Thule Landmark 40L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/4f3kh4o1hc/thule-landmark-40l/)

by [Thule](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Thule)

![Front facing view of the Thule Landmark 40L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1616994691/carryons/Thule_Landmark_40L_uf4sm6.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>40 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×34×26 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>6%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$149</td></tr></tbody></table>

Looking at both the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Thule Landmark 40L, you'll first want to consider the dimensions and capacity. The Cotopaxi stands 20 inches tall, 30 inches wide and 51 inches deep, with a total capacity of 35 liters. It's a sturdy, durable backpack made from 1680D ballistic nylon paneling, and weighs only 1.5 pounds. If you’re a traveling digital nomad, you'll appreciate that it includes a laptop compartment that can conveniently fit a 15-inch laptop.

Now for the Thule Landmark 40L. It's somewhat bigger, measuring 56 inches tall, 34 inches wide, and 26 inches deep, with a total capacity of 40 liters. It weighs slightly less than the Cotopaxi at 1.4 pounds and is constructed from 420D Dobby polyester and 600D polyester. Its laptop compartment is designed to accommodate a 1-inch laptop.

Here's a quick comparison:

-   Dimensions: Cotopaxi is 20x30x51 inches, Thule is 56x34x26 inches.
-   Capacity: 35 liters for Cotopaxi, 40 liters for Thule.
-   Weight: 1.5 pounds for Cotopaxi, 1.4 pounds for Thule.
-   Material: Cotopaxi uses 1680D ballistic nylon, Thule uses a combination of 420D Dobby and 600D polyester.
-   Laptop compartment: Cotopaxi fits a 15-inch laptop, Thule fits a 1-inch model.

When considering these two backpacks, it's not simply about comparing measurements and material. Take note of airline compatibility with both models. The Cotopaxi received a score of 80% compatibility, whilst the Thule outperformed at 91%.

Reviewers hold both packs in high esteem. One spoke highly of the Cotopaxi, suggesting that it is the perfect gift for the budding world traveler due to its convenience and durability. In contrast, the Thule Landmark 40L was praised for its added security features, giving peace of mind during travel. Certainly, both packs have their unique features to offer, with Cotopaxi providing extras like a rain cover, mesh laundry bag, and nylon shoe bag, while the Thule impresses with a useful water bottle pocket and a well-organized SafeZone compartment. Choosing between the two would be a question of your individual preferences and travel needs.