---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/2ejwt5vraf/trakke-stor/"
title: "Cotopaxi Allpa 35L versus Trakke Stor - One Bag Travel"
description: "Comparison of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Trakke Stor carry-on travel backpacks."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/2ejwt5vraf/trakke-stor/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Trakke Stor

# Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Trakke Stor

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/mcN0aY6G/cotopaxi-allpa-35l/)

by [Cotopaxi](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Cotopaxi)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/an7zqlk8sro7sdinpykn)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>35 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.3 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×30×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$225</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Trakke Stor |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| front | Passport | front |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | hideable |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon</td><td>Waxed canvas</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Trakke Stor](https://onebag.travel/carryon/2ejwt5vraf/trakke-stor/)

by [Trakke](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Trakke)

![Front facing view of the Trakke Stor](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601579706/carryons/trakke_wcngmr.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>30 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>49×34×19 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>91%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$350</td></tr></tbody></table>

When considering a carry-on backpack for traveling, both the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Trakke Stor are fantastic options. Both have been commended for their good design and durability. The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L weighs slightly more than the Trakke Stor, which weighs a mere 1.4 pounds, but has more carrying capacity, offering a substantial 35 liters as compared to the Stor's 30 liters. While both can easily store a 15-inch laptop, there are other aspects to take into account.

-   **Size**: Cotopaxi Allpa (20x30x51 inches), Trakke Stor (49x34x19 inches)
-   **Weight**: Cotopaxi Allpa (1.5 pounds), Trakke Stor (1.4 pounds)
-   **Capacity**: Cotopaxi Allpa (35 liters), Trakke Stor (30 liters)
-   **Airline compatibility**: Cotopaxi Allpa (80% of airlines), Trakke Stor (98% of airlines)
-   **Material**: Cotopaxi Allpa (1680D ballistic nylon paneling), Trakke Stor (Waxed canvas)
-   **Extras**: Cotopaxi Allpa includes a rain cover, mesh laundry bag, and nylon shoe bag. Trakke Stor is especially noted for its water resistance.

The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L has been praised for its "smart design," and is preferred for its light and easy nature. The reviewers spoke highly of its internal organization and highlighted that the bag comes with additional items such as a rain cover, a collapsible mesh laundry bag, and a nylon shoe bag. On the other hand, the Trakke Stor is recognized for its "rugged, heritage-inspired aesthetics" and "premium materials." The Stor's craftsmanship is applauded and its water-resistant quality makes it a durable choice for frequent travelers.

In choosing the better pack of the two, it might come down to compatibility with airlines. While the Allpa does hold more gear, Cotopaxi's pack is only compatible with 80% of airlines as opposed to the 98% compatibility of the Trakke Stor. Another strong selling point for the Stor backpack is its craftsmanship and aesthetic appeal. Overall, both are built to serve their purpose efficiently and whichever bag is selected will prove to be a reliable travel partner.