---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/kd8m4tzuib/lo-sons-hanover-2/we8jc3v3uo/stm-grace/"
title: "Lo & Sons Hanover 2 vs STM Grace - One Bag Travel"
description: "Lo & Sons Hanover 2 vs STM Grace: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/kd8m4tzuib/lo-sons-hanover-2/we8jc3v3uo/stm-grace/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Lo & Sons Hanover 2 vs. STM Grace

# Lo & Sons Hanover 2 vs. STM Grace

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Lo & Sons Hanover 2](https://onebag.travel/carryon/kd8m4tzuib/lo-sons-hanover-2/)

by [Lo & Sons](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Lo & Sons)

![Front facing view of the Lo & Sons Hanover 2](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1628925105/carryons/Lo_Sons_Hanover_2_y8pava.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>21.4 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.8 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>42×30×18 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>95%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$238</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Lo & Sons Hanover 2 | Feature | STM Grace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 4 |
| Y | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| N | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside |
| 13in | Laptop | 15in |
| 1 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
|  | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>600D Recycled Poly</td><td>100% polyester</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [STM Grace](https://onebag.travel/carryon/we8jc3v3uo/stm-grace/)

by [Stm](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Stm)

![Front facing view of the STM Grace](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1634044887/carryons/STM_Grace_s3y2s6.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>20 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.6 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>42×29×11 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>95%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$100</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Lo & Sons Hanover 2 and STM Grace

-   **Passport pocket:** Yes on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2; No on the STM Grace.
-   **Luggage passthrough:** Yes on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2; No on the STM Grace.
-   **Laptop sleeve:** 13in on the Lo & Sons Hanover 2; 15in on the STM Grace.

Both have: backpack straps, built-in organizer, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 180 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

## Lo & Sons Hanover 2 vs. STM Grace: which should you pack?

The **Lo & Sons Hanover 2** carries 1.3999999999999986L more than the **STM Grace** (21.4L vs. 20L), while the **STM Grace** is the lighter pack at 0.6kg (vs. 0.8kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Lo & Sons Hanover 2** fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Lo & Sons Hanover 2; if you want to travel lighter, the STM Grace is the better call.