---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/jra8f8loo2/osprey-flapjill/okohae03di/cotopaxi-nazca-24l/"
title: "Osprey Flapjill vs Cotopaxi Nazca 24L (discontinued)"
description: "Osprey Flapjill vs Cotopaxi Nazca 24L (discontinued): capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/jra8f8loo2/osprey-flapjill/okohae03di/cotopaxi-nazca-24l/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Osprey Flapjill vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

# Osprey Flapjill vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Osprey Flapjill](https://onebag.travel/carryon/jra8f8loo2/osprey-flapjill/)

![Front facing view of the Osprey Flapjill](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1601587015/carryons/flapagil_qktukw.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>19 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>0.9 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>46×34×23 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>74%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$110</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Osprey Flapjill | Feature | Cotopaxi Nazca 24L |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
|  | Compression |  |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 0 | Opening | 0 |
| side | Passport | top |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
|  | Backpack |  |
| removable | Hip Belt |  |
|  | Sternum Strap |  |
| Inside |
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
|  | Water Bottle Holder |  |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>600D Polyspun</td><td>cotton/polyester canvas shell</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Cotopaxi Nazca 24L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/okohae03di/cotopaxi-nazca-24l/)

![Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/carryons/btzropojpfaic1vbeiuu)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>24 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.1 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>51×27×14 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>90%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$140</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Osprey Flapjill and Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

-   **Passport pocket:** Side on the Osprey Flapjill; Top on the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L.
-   **Built-in organizer:** Yes on the Osprey Flapjill; No on the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L.

Both have: laptop sleeve, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 134 accept both. 5 accept only the Osprey Flapjill, and 36 accept only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L.

### Only the Osprey Flapjill fits

Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

### Only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L fits

Air Baltic, Air China, Air Malta, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Blue Air, Bulgaria Air, China Eastern, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, flybe, Great Lakes Airlines, Icelandair, InselAir, Juneyao Airlines, Liat Airlines, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Pakistan International, Royal Brunei Airlines, Ryanair, S7, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Volotea, Xiamen.

## Osprey Flapjill vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L: which should you pack?

The **Cotopaxi Nazca 24L** carries 5L more than the **Osprey Flapjill** (19L vs. 24L), while the **Osprey Flapjill** is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Cotopaxi Nazca 24L** fits 90% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L; if you want to travel lighter, the Osprey Flapjill is the better call.