---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/ewr51xgkjd/thule-landmark/l1939624rq/lowe-alpine-escape-flight-pro-40l-cabin-pack/"
title: "Thule Landmark vs Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack"
description: "Thule Landmark vs Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/ewr51xgkjd/thule-landmark/l1939624rq/lowe-alpine-escape-flight-pro-40l-cabin-pack/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Thule Landmark vs. Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack

# Thule Landmark vs. Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Thule Landmark](https://onebag.travel/carryon/ewr51xgkjd/thule-landmark/)

by [Thule](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Thule)

![Front facing view of the Thule Landmark](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1788990443/carryons/thule-landmark-ewr51xgkjd.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>40 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×33×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>38%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$220</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Thule Landmark | Feature | Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| 4 | Compression | 4 |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| top | Passport | top |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | removable |
| Inside |
| 16in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | 1, side |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>420D Dobby polyester, bluesign approved</td><td>PFAS free</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack](https://onebag.travel/carryon/l1939624rq/lowe-alpine-escape-flight-pro-40l-cabin-pack/)

by [Lowe Alpine](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Lowe Alpine)

![Front facing view of the Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1788990379/carryons/lowe-alpine-escape-flight-pro-40l-cabin-pack-l1939624rq.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>40 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.4 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>55×33×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>38%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$204</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Thule Landmark and Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack

-   **Backpack straps:** Hideable on the Thule Landmark; Yes on the Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack.
-   **Hip belt:** Hideable on the Thule Landmark; No on the Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack.
-   **Sternum strap:** Yes on the Thule Landmark; Removable on the Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack.
-   **Laptop sleeve:** 16in on the Thule Landmark; 15in on the Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack.

Both have: compression straps, passport pocket, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 72 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

## Thule Landmark vs. Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack: which should you pack?

The **Thule Landmark** carries the same capacity as the **Lowe Alpine Escape Flight Pro 40L Cabin Pack** (40L vs. 40L), while the **Thule Landmark** is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Thule Landmark** fits 38% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Thule Landmark; if you want to travel lighter, the Thule Landmark is the better call.
