---
url: "https://onebag.travel/compare/dauzj1f2ni/patagonia-cragsmith-pack-45l/wnfolw37xn/ortlieb-atrack-st/"
title: "Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L vs Ortlieb Atrack ST"
description: "Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L vs Ortlieb Atrack ST: capacity, weight, dimensions and how many airlines accept each as a carry-on, side by side."
source: "https://onebag.travel/compare/dauzj1f2ni/patagonia-cragsmith-pack-45l/wnfolw37xn/ortlieb-atrack-st/"
---
1.  [Home](https://onebag.travel/)
2.  [Carry-On Travel Backpacks](https://onebag.travel/carryons/)
3.  Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L vs. Ortlieb Atrack ST

# Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L vs. Ortlieb Atrack ST

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

## [Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L](https://onebag.travel/carryon/dauzj1f2ni/patagonia-cragsmith-pack-45l/)

by [Patagonia](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Patagonia)

![Front facing view of the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1633531847/carryons/Cragsmith_Pack_45L_i4buem.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>45 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.559 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>60×27×20 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$199</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Feature by feature

| Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L | Feature | Ortlieb Atrack ST |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Storage |
| Y | Compression | Y |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 0 | Opening | 4 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry |
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| Y | Hip Belt | Y |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside |
| N | Laptop | N |
| 1 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer |  |
| Outside |
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 2 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |

<table class="cmp-material"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2">Material</td></tr><tr><td>630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% polyester</td><td>PS33</td></tr></tbody></table>

## [Ortlieb Atrack ST](https://onebag.travel/carryon/wnfolw37xn/ortlieb-atrack-st/)

by [Ortlieb](https://onebag.travel/carryons/?brands=Ortlieb)

![Front facing view of the Ortlieb Atrack ST](https://res.cloudinary.com/obt/image/upload/c_fill,w_400/v1630938166/carryons/Atrack_ST_kabren.webp)

<table class="table table-sm cmp-spec mt-2"><tbody><tr><td>Capacity</td><td>25 L</td></tr><tr><td>Weight</td><td>1.41 kg</td></tr><tr><td>Dimensions</td><td>56×26×25 cm</td></tr><tr><td>Airline fit</td><td>27%</td></tr><tr><td>Price</td><td>$250</td></tr></tbody></table>

## Key differences between the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L and Ortlieb Atrack ST

-   **Opening:** Other on the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L; Top zip on the Ortlieb Atrack ST.

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

## Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 31 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L, and 20 accept only the Ortlieb Atrack ST.

### Only the Ortlieb Atrack ST fits

Aegean Airlines, Air Astana, Air Nostrum, Atlas Global, British Airways, Copa Airlines, EL AL, Finnair, Great Lakes Airlines, Iran Aseman Air, Jet2, Kuwait Air, Middle East Airlines, Monarch Airlines, Onur Air, Spirit Airlines, Thai Airways, Travel Service Airlines, Uzbekistan Air, WOW Airlines.

## Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L vs. Ortlieb Atrack ST: which should you pack?

The **Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L** carries 20L more than the **Ortlieb Atrack ST** (45L vs. 25L), while the **Ortlieb Atrack ST** is the lighter pack at 1.41kg (vs. 1.559kg). For carry-on flexibility, the **Ortlieb Atrack ST** fits 27% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L; if you want to travel lighter, the Ortlieb Atrack ST is the better call.